lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 19 May 2021 14:28:05 +0800
From:   Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>
To:     Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
        arm-mail-list <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        heiko.stuebner@...obroma-systems.com, leobras.c@...il.com,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] rockpro64: PCI BAR reassignment broken by commit
 9d57e61bf723 ("of/pci: Add IORESOURCE_MEM_64 to resource flags for 64-bit
 memory addresses")



On 2021/5/18 下午5:09, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
> After doing a git bisect I was able to trace the following error when booting my
> rockpro64 v2 (rk3399 SoC) with a PCIE NVME expansion card:

I'm also hitting the same problem, with a RockPi 4B board.

[...]
> [    0.393269] pci_bus 0000:01: busn_res: [bus 01-1f] end is updated to 01
> [    0.393311] pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 14: no space for [mem size 0x00100000]
> [    0.393333] pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 14: failed to assign [mem size 0x00100000]
> [    0.393356] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: no space for [mem size 0x00004000 64bit]
> [    0.393375] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: failed to assign [mem size 0x00004000 64bit]

The same error here.

> [    0.393397] pci 0000:00:00.0: PCI bridge to [bus 01]
> [    0.393839] pcieport 0000:00:00.0: PME: Signaling with IRQ 78
> [    0.394165] pcieport 0000:00:00.0: AER: enabled with IRQ 78
> [..]
> 
> to the commit 9d57e61bf723 ("of/pci: Add IORESOURCE_MEM_64 to resource flags for
> 64-bit memory addresses"). For reference, here is the dmesg output when BAR
> reassignment works:

Great thanks for the pinning down the bug, at least I can try to boot my 
board again with the patch reverted.

Thanks,
Qu

> 
> [..]
> [    0.307381] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: host bridge /pcie@...00000 ranges:
> [    0.307445] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie:      MEM 0x00fa000000..0x00fbdfffff ->
> 0x00fa000000
> [    0.307481] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie:       IO 0x00fbe00000..0x00fbefffff ->
> 0x00fbe00000
> [    0.308406] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: supply vpcie1v8 not found, using dummy
> regulator
> [    0.308534] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: supply vpcie0v9 not found, using dummy
> regulator
> [    0.374676] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00
> [    0.374701] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [bus 00-1f]
> [    0.374723] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0xfa000000-0xfbdfffff]
> [    0.374746] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [io  0x0000-0xfffff] (bus
> address [0xfbe00000-0xfbefffff])
> [    0.374808] pci 0000:00:00.0: [1d87:0100] type 01 class 0x060400
> [    0.374943] pci 0000:00:00.0: supports D1
> [    0.374961] pci 0000:00:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D1 D3hot
> [    0.379473] pci 0000:00:00.0: bridge configuration invalid ([bus 00-00]),
> reconfiguring
> [    0.379712] pci 0000:01:00.0: [144d:a808] type 00 class 0x010802
> [    0.379815] pci 0000:01:00.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0x00000000-0x00003fff 64bit]
> [    0.379997] pci 0000:01:00.0: Max Payload Size set to 256 (was 128, max 256)
> [    0.380607] pci 0000:01:00.0: 8.000 Gb/s available PCIe bandwidth, limited by
> 2.5 GT/s PCIe x4 link at 0000:00:00.0 (capable of 31.504 Gb/s with 8.0 GT/s PCIe
> x4 link)
> [    0.394239] pci_bus 0000:01: busn_res: [bus 01-1f] end is updated to 01
> [    0.394285] pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 14: assigned [mem 0xfa000000-0xfa0fffff]
> [    0.394312] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0xfa000000-0xfa003fff 64bit]
> [    0.394374] pci 0000:00:00.0: PCI bridge to [bus 01]
> [    0.394395] pci 0000:00:00.0:   bridge window [mem 0xfa000000-0xfa0fffff]
> [    0.394569] pcieport 0000:00:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002)
> [    0.394845] pcieport 0000:00:00.0: PME: Signaling with IRQ 78
> [    0.395153] pcieport 0000:00:00.0: AER: enabled with IRQ 78
> [..]
> 
> And here is the output of lspci when BAR reassignment works:
> 
> # lspci -v
> 00:00.0 PCI bridge: Fuzhou Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd RK3399 PCI Express Root
> Port (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
>      Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 78
>      Bus: primary=00, secondary=01, subordinate=01, sec-latency=0
>      I/O behind bridge: 00000000-00000fff [size=4K]
>      Memory behind bridge: fa000000-fa0fffff [size=1M]
>      Prefetchable memory behind bridge: 00000000-000fffff [size=1M]
>      Capabilities: [80] Power Management version 3
>      Capabilities: [90] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable+ 64bit+
>      Capabilities: [b0] MSI-X: Enable- Count=1 Masked-
>      Capabilities: [c0] Express Root Port (Slot+), MSI 00
>      Capabilities: [100] Advanced Error Reporting
>      Capabilities: [274] Transaction Processing Hints
>      Kernel driver in use: pcieport
> lspci: Unable to load libkmod resources: error -2
> 
> 01:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd NVMe SSD
> Controller SM981/PM981/PM983 (prog-if 02 [NVM Express])
>      Subsystem: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd NVMe SSD Controller SM981/PM981/PM983
>      Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 77, NUMA node 0
>      Memory at fa000000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K]
>      Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 3
>      Capabilities: [50] MSI: Enable- Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit+
>      Capabilities: [70] Express Endpoint, MSI 00
>      Capabilities: [b0] MSI-X: Enable+ Count=33 Masked-
>      Capabilities: [100] Advanced Error Reporting
>      Capabilities: [148] Device Serial Number 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00
>      Capabilities: [158] Power Budgeting <?>
>      Capabilities: [168] Secondary PCI Express
>      Capabilities: [188] Latency Tolerance Reporting
>      Capabilities: [190] L1 PM Substates
>      Kernel driver in use: nvme
> 
> I can provide more information if needed (the board is sitting on my desk) and I
> can help with testing the fix.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alex
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ