lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210519005107.m44dknz4ih233pbc@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date:   Wed, 19 May 2021 08:51:07 +0800
From:   Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Corentin Labbe <clabbe@...libre.com>, chohnstaedt@...ominate.com,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] crypto: start to fix ixp4xx

On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 11:36:01PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
> Sadly they do, it's these:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/20210510213634.600866-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org/
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/20210510213634.600866-2-linus.walleij@linaro.org/
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/20210510213634.600866-3-linus.walleij@linaro.org/
> 
> I guess we could turn it around: I see if I can apply these two
> on top of the crypto tree and resend then we hope there is no
> collision in the ARM SoC tree instead.
> 
> I need to respin the series anyway so shall we try this?

Yes I think those changes are probably best routed through crypto
as the code changes are quite extensive so the potential for non-
trivial conflicts is high.

Thanks,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ