linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6] mm: slub: move sysfs slab alloc/free interfaces to debugfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ddc70189-39a0-04b3-8d89-57cb524792df@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Wed, 19 May 2021 16:18:20 +0530
From:   Faiyaz Mohammed <faiyazm@...eaurora.org>
To:     Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:     cl@...ux.com, penberg@...nel.org, rientjes@...gle.com,
        iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, vbabka@...e.cz,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        glittao@...il.com, vinmenon@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] mm: slub: move sysfs slab alloc/free interfaces to
 debugfs

Hi,

On 5/18/2021 6:58 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 06:15:49PM +0530, Faiyaz Mohammed wrote:
>> alloc_calls and free_calls implementation in sysfs have two issues,
>> one is PAGE_SIZE limitiation of sysfs and other is it does not adhere
>> to "one value per file" rule.
>>
>> To overcome this issues, move the alloc_calls and free_calls implemeation
>> to debugfs.
>>
>> Rename the alloc_calls/free_calls to alloc_traces/free_traces,
>> to be inline with what it does.
>>
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Faiyaz Mohammed <faiyazm@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>>  include/linux/slub_def.h |   8 ++
>>  mm/slab_common.c         |   9 ++
>>  mm/slub.c                | 359 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>>  3 files changed, 294 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-)
> 
> If this is v6, what happened in v1-5?  That should always be below the
> --- line, right?
> 
Will update in next patch version.

Thanks and regards,
Mohammed Faiyaz