linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/5] ARM: dts: qcom: Add tsens details to ipq806x

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 19 May 2021 12:00:32 +0100
From:   Jonathan McDowell <noodles@...th.li>
To:     Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@...il.com>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] ARM: dts: qcom: Add tsens details to ipq806x

On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 03:12:02PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 15-05-21, 17:52, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> 
> >  		gcc: clock-controller@...000 {
> > -			compatible = "qcom,gcc-ipq8064";
> > +			compatible = "qcom,gcc-ipq8064", "syscon";
> 
> Does this belong here

No, not sure how that slipped in, will remove for v2.

> >  			reg = <0x00900000 0x4000>;
> >  			#clock-cells = <1>;
> >  			#reset-cells = <1>;
> > +			#power-domain-cells = <1>;
> > +
> > +			tsens: thermal-sensor@...000 {
> > +				compatible = "qcom,ipq8064-tsens";
> > +
> > +				nvmem-cells = <&tsens_calib>, <&tsens_calib_backup>;
> > +				nvmem-cell-names = "calib", "calib_backup";
> > +				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 178 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > +				interrupt-names = "uplow";
> > +
> > +				#qcom,sensors = <11>;
> > +				#thermal-sensor-cells = <1>;
> > +			};
> 
> We have sensor under gcc node..?

Weirdly, yes, that seems to be where it lives for the 8064.

J.

-- 
I'm dangerous when I know what I'm doing.