[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210519124438.GA1417@agape.jhs>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 14:44:38 +0200
From: Fabio Aiuto <fabioaiuto83@...il.com>
To: Bryan Brattlof <hello@...anbrattlof.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: remove if (true) statement
Hi Bryan,
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 02:45:19PM +0000, Bryan Brattlof wrote:
> 'if (true) { ... }' will always evaluate to true. Remove it and
> save a few tabs for somewhere else.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bryan Brattlof <hello@...anbrattlof.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c | 159 ++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c
> index 9df4476b2e2d..98b1bec67999 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c
> @@ -59,112 +59,109 @@ static void update_BCNTIM(struct adapter *padapter)
>
I was wondering why are you using the first patch of a nine patch
series as a 'cover letter' of an eight patch patchset.
In other words, why putting the In-Reply-To field of all patches subsequent
to the first one ponting to the first patch itself as a cover letter,
is it a recommened practice?
thank you,
fabio
Powered by blists - more mailing lists