[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210519135251.30093-2-joro@8bytes.org>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 15:52:44 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: x86@...nel.org, Hyunwook Baek <baekhw@...gle.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Cfir Cohen <cfir@...gle.com>,
Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas@...gle.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mike Stunes <mstunes@...are.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Martin Radev <martin.b.radev@...il.com>,
Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>,
linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/8] x86/sev-es: Don't return NULL from sev_es_get_ghcb()
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
The sev_es_get_ghcb() is called from several places, but only one of
them checks the return value. The reaction to returning NULL is always
the same: Calling panic() and kill the machine.
Instead of adding checks to all call-places, move the panic() into the
function itself so that it will no longer return NULL.
Fixes: 0786138c78e7 ("x86/sev-es: Add a Runtime #VC Exception Handler")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v5.10+
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
---
arch/x86/kernel/sev.c | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/sev.c b/arch/x86/kernel/sev.c
index 4fa111becc93..82bced88153b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/sev.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/sev.c
@@ -203,8 +203,18 @@ static __always_inline struct ghcb *sev_es_get_ghcb(struct ghcb_state *state)
if (unlikely(data->ghcb_active)) {
/* GHCB is already in use - save its contents */
- if (unlikely(data->backup_ghcb_active))
- return NULL;
+ if (unlikely(data->backup_ghcb_active)) {
+ /*
+ * Backup-GHCB is also already in use. There is no way
+ * to continue here so just kill the machine. To make
+ * panic() work, mark GHCBs inactive so that messages
+ * can be printed out.
+ */
+ data->ghcb_active = false;
+ data->backup_ghcb_active = false;
+
+ panic("Unable to handle #VC exception! GHCB and Backup GHCB are already in use");
+ }
/* Mark backup_ghcb active before writing to it */
data->backup_ghcb_active = true;
@@ -1289,7 +1299,6 @@ static __always_inline bool on_vc_fallback_stack(struct pt_regs *regs)
*/
DEFINE_IDTENTRY_VC_SAFE_STACK(exc_vmm_communication)
{
- struct sev_es_runtime_data *data = this_cpu_read(runtime_data);
irqentry_state_t irq_state;
struct ghcb_state state;
struct es_em_ctxt ctxt;
@@ -1315,16 +1324,6 @@ DEFINE_IDTENTRY_VC_SAFE_STACK(exc_vmm_communication)
*/
ghcb = sev_es_get_ghcb(&state);
- if (!ghcb) {
- /*
- * Mark GHCBs inactive so that panic() is able to print the
- * message.
- */
- data->ghcb_active = false;
- data->backup_ghcb_active = false;
-
- panic("Unable to handle #VC exception! GHCB and Backup GHCB are already in use");
- }
vc_ghcb_invalidate(ghcb);
result = vc_init_em_ctxt(&ctxt, regs, error_code);
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists