[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <cc2b848d112d86bd1f4ea3f2813d0a016e44a364.1621424513.git.asml.silence@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 15:13:25 +0100
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
To: io-uring@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Horst Schirmeier <horst.schirmeier@...dortmund.de>,
"Franz-B . Tuneke" <franz-bernhard.tuneke@...dortmund.de>,
Christian Dietrich <stettberger@...ucode.de>
Subject: [PATCH 14/23] io_uring: add support for bpf requests
Wire up a new io_uring operation type IORING_OP_BPF, which executes a
specified BPF program from the registered prog table. It doesn't allow
to do anything useful for now, no BPF functions are allowed apart from
basic ones.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
---
fs/io_uring.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 93 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index b13cbcd5c47b..20fddc5945f2 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -682,6 +682,11 @@ struct io_unlink {
struct filename *filename;
};
+struct io_bpf {
+ struct file *file;
+ struct bpf_prog *prog;
+};
+
struct io_completion {
struct file *file;
struct list_head list;
@@ -826,6 +831,7 @@ struct io_kiocb {
struct io_shutdown shutdown;
struct io_rename rename;
struct io_unlink unlink;
+ struct io_bpf bpf;
/* use only after cleaning per-op data, see io_clean_op() */
struct io_completion compl;
};
@@ -875,6 +881,9 @@ struct io_defer_entry {
u32 seq;
};
+struct io_bpf_ctx {
+};
+
struct io_op_def {
/* needs req->file assigned */
unsigned needs_file : 1;
@@ -1039,6 +1048,7 @@ static const struct io_op_def io_op_defs[] = {
},
[IORING_OP_RENAMEAT] = {},
[IORING_OP_UNLINKAT] = {},
+ [IORING_OP_BPF] = {},
};
static bool io_disarm_next(struct io_kiocb *req);
@@ -1070,6 +1080,7 @@ static void io_rsrc_put_work(struct work_struct *work);
static void io_req_task_queue(struct io_kiocb *req);
static void io_submit_flush_completions(struct io_comp_state *cs,
struct io_ring_ctx *ctx);
+static void io_bpf_run(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags);
static bool io_poll_remove_waitqs(struct io_kiocb *req);
static int io_req_prep_async(struct io_kiocb *req);
@@ -3931,6 +3942,53 @@ static int io_openat(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
return io_openat2(req, issue_flags);
}
+static int io_bpf_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
+{
+ struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
+ struct bpf_prog *prog;
+ unsigned int idx;
+
+ if (unlikely(ctx->flags & (IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL|IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL)))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ if (unlikely(req->flags & (REQ_F_FIXED_FILE | REQ_F_BUFFER_SELECT)))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ if (sqe->ioprio || sqe->len || sqe->cancel_flags)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ if (sqe->addr)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ idx = READ_ONCE(sqe->off);
+ if (unlikely(idx >= ctx->nr_bpf_progs))
+ return -EFAULT;
+ idx = array_index_nospec(idx, ctx->nr_bpf_progs);
+ prog = ctx->bpf_progs[idx].prog;
+ if (!prog)
+ return -EFAULT;
+
+ req->bpf.prog = prog;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void io_bpf_run_task_work(struct callback_head *cb)
+{
+ struct io_kiocb *req = container_of(cb, struct io_kiocb, task_work);
+ struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
+
+ mutex_lock(&ctx->uring_lock);
+ io_bpf_run(req, 0);
+ mutex_unlock(&ctx->uring_lock);
+}
+
+static int io_bpf(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
+{
+ init_task_work(&req->task_work, io_bpf_run_task_work);
+ if (unlikely(io_req_task_work_add(req))) {
+ req_ref_get(req);
+ io_req_task_queue_fail(req, -ECANCELED);
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int io_remove_buffers_prep(struct io_kiocb *req,
const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
{
@@ -6002,6 +6060,8 @@ static int io_req_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
return io_renameat_prep(req, sqe);
case IORING_OP_UNLINKAT:
return io_unlinkat_prep(req, sqe);
+ case IORING_OP_BPF:
+ return io_bpf_prep(req, sqe);
}
printk_once(KERN_WARNING "io_uring: unhandled opcode %d\n",
@@ -6269,6 +6329,9 @@ static int io_issue_sqe(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
case IORING_OP_UNLINKAT:
ret = io_unlinkat(req, issue_flags);
break;
+ case IORING_OP_BPF:
+ ret = io_bpf(req, issue_flags);
+ break;
default:
ret = -EINVAL;
break;
@@ -10303,6 +10366,35 @@ const struct bpf_verifier_ops bpf_io_uring_verifier_ops = {
.is_valid_access = io_bpf_is_valid_access,
};
+static void io_bpf_run(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
+{
+ struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
+ struct io_bpf_ctx bpf_ctx;
+ struct bpf_prog *prog;
+ int ret = -EAGAIN;
+
+ lockdep_assert_held(&req->ctx->uring_lock);
+
+ if (unlikely(percpu_ref_is_dying(&ctx->refs) ||
+ atomic_read(&req->task->io_uring->in_idle)))
+ goto done;
+
+ memset(&bpf_ctx, 0, sizeof(bpf_ctx));
+ prog = req->bpf.prog;
+
+ if (prog->aux->sleepable) {
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu(req->bpf.prog, &bpf_ctx);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ } else {
+ bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu(req->bpf.prog, &bpf_ctx);
+ }
+
+ ret = 0;
+done:
+ __io_req_complete(req, issue_flags, ret, 0);
+}
+
SYSCALL_DEFINE4(io_uring_register, unsigned int, fd, unsigned int, opcode,
void __user *, arg, unsigned int, nr_args)
{
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
index b450f41d7389..25ab804670e1 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
@@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ enum {
IORING_OP_SHUTDOWN,
IORING_OP_RENAMEAT,
IORING_OP_UNLINKAT,
+ IORING_OP_BPF,
/* this goes last, obviously */
IORING_OP_LAST,
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists