[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGOxZ524m0tYy2Y8xnkfoSg9PQj7uA6PohYC9u23Je3F+gHjDA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 20:06:02 +0530
From: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: samsung: pmu: fix BUT->BIT macro typo
Hello Krzysztof
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 7:59 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com> wrote:
>
> The macro EXYNOS5_USE_STANDBYWFI_ARM_CORE1 should use BIT, not BUT. Fix
> does not have real effect as the macro is not used in the code.
>
Can we consider removing this? As this is not used in code.
> Fixes: af2e0a0754ac ("ARM: EXYNOS: Add PMU support for exynos5420")
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
> ---
> include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h b/include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h
> index fc9250fb3133..4bfd9a210da2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h
> @@ -613,7 +613,7 @@
>
> /* For EXYNOS_CENTRAL_SEQ_OPTION */
> #define EXYNOS5_USE_STANDBYWFI_ARM_CORE0 BIT(16)
> -#define EXYNOS5_USE_STANDBYWFI_ARM_CORE1 BUT(17)
> +#define EXYNOS5_USE_STANDBYWFI_ARM_CORE1 BIT(17)
> #define EXYNOS5_USE_STANDBYWFE_ARM_CORE0 BIT(24)
> #define EXYNOS5_USE_STANDBYWFE_ARM_CORE1 BIT(25)
>
> --
> 2.27.0
>
--
Regards,
Alim
Powered by blists - more mailing lists