linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v18 00/18] KVM RISC-V Support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1ce20fe0-0fea-406a-f7bf-1dde686b411a@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 19 May 2021 17:26:41 +0200
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>, Anup Patel <anup.patel@....com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Alexander Graf <graf@...zon.com>,
        Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>,
        Alistair Francis <Alistair.Francis@....com>,
        Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@....com>,
        KVM General <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 00/18] KVM RISC-V Support

On 19/05/21 17:08, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> It's sort of frustrating that none of this information was in the commit
> message.
> 
> "This code is not ready to be merged into the arch/risc/ directory
> because the RISC-V Foundation has not certified the hardware spec yet.
> However, the following chips have implemented it ABC12345, ABC6789 and
> they've already shipping to thousands of customers since blah blah blah
> so we should support it."
> 
> I honestly thought it was an issue with the code or the userspace API.

Yes, I was expecting this to be in the staging TODO file - I should have 
been more explicit with Anup.

Paolo