linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 219/240] thermal/core/fair share: Lock the thermal zone while looping over instances

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210520092116.048137472@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 20 May 2021 11:23:31 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 219/240] thermal/core/fair share: Lock the thermal zone while looping over instances

From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>

commit fef05776eb02238dcad8d5514e666a42572c3f32 upstream.

The tz->lock must be hold during the looping over the instances in that
thermal zone. This lock was missing in the governor code since the
beginning, so it's hard to point into a particular commit.

CC: stable@...r.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422153624.6074-2-lukasz.luba@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/thermal/fair_share.c |    4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/thermal/fair_share.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/fair_share.c
@@ -93,6 +93,8 @@ static int fair_share_throttle(struct th
 	int total_instance = 0;
 	int cur_trip_level = get_trip_level(tz);
 
+	mutex_lock(&tz->lock);
+
 	list_for_each_entry(instance, &tz->thermal_instances, tz_node) {
 		if (instance->trip != trip)
 			continue;
@@ -121,6 +123,8 @@ static int fair_share_throttle(struct th
 		mutex_unlock(&instance->cdev->lock);
 		thermal_cdev_update(cdev);
 	}
+
+	mutex_unlock(&tz->lock);
 	return 0;
 }