[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210520054816.GA21693@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 07:48:16 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Drew Fustini <drew@...gleboard.org>,
Anup Patel <anup.patel@....com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>, wefu@...hat.com,
lazyparser@...il.com,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev, Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Nick Kossifidis <mick@....forth.gr>,
Benjamin Koch <snowball@...b.de>,
Matteo Croce <mcroce@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Wei Fu <tekkamanninja@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] riscv: Add DMA_COHERENT support
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 09:45:45AM +0800, Guo Ren wrote:
> It's a very big MIPS smell. What's the attribute of the uncached
> window? (uncached + strong-order/ uncached + weak, most vendors still
> use AXI interconnect, how to deal with a bufferable attribute?) In
> fact, customers' drivers use different ways to deal with DMA memory in
> non-coherent SOC. Most riscv SOC vendors are from ARM, so giving them
> the same way in DMA memory is a smart choice. So using PTE attributes
> is more suitable.
I'm not saying it is a good idea. Just that apparently this exists in
the ASICs.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists