[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7e1877ce-360a-65d9-8e8e-48795fb47493@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 16:22:52 +1000
From: imran.f.khan@...cle.com
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/apic: Fix BUG due to multiple allocation of
legacy vectors.
On 20/5/21 3:56 pm, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 11:39:28PM +0000, Imran Khan wrote:
>> During activation of secondary CPUs, lapic_online is
>> invoked to initialize vectors. While lapic_online
>> installs legacy vectors on all CPUs, it does not set
>> the corresponding bits in per CPU bitmap maintained
>> under irq_matrix.
>> This may result in these legacy vectors getting allocated
>> by irq_matrix_alloc and if that happens subsequent invocation
>> of apic_update_vector will cause BUG like the one shown below:
>>
>> [ 154.738226] kernel BUG at arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c:172!
>> [ 154.805956] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
>> [ 154.858092] CPU: 22 PID: 3569 Comm: ifup-eth Not tainted 5.8.0-20200716.x86_64 #1
>> [ 154.954939] Hardware name: Oracle Corporation ORACLE SERVER X6-2/ASM,MOTHERBOARD,1U
>> [ 155.073636] RIP: 0010:apic_update_vector+0xa7/0x190
>> [ 155.131996] Code: 01 00 4a 8b 14 ed 80 69 01 a6 48 89 c8 4a 8d 04 e0 48 8b 04 10 48
>> 85 c0 0f 84 d2 00 00 00 48 3d 00 f0 ff ff 0f 87 c6 00 00 00 <0f> 0b 41 8b 46 10 48 0f
[.....]
>> [ 156.268168] Call Trace:
>> [ 156.297409] ? irq_matrix_alloc+0x8a/0x150
>> [ 156.346408] assign_vector_locked+0xd2/0x170
>> [ 156.397489] x86_vector_activate+0x1b5/0x320
>> [ 156.448570] __irq_domain_activate_irq+0x64/0xa0
>> [ 156.503808] __irq_domain_activate_irq+0x38/0xa0
>> [ 156.559050] irq_domain_activate_irq+0x2b/0x40
>> [ 156.612213] irq_activate+0x25/0x30
>> [ 156.653930] __setup_irq+0x58f/0x7b0
>> [ 156.696690] request_threaded_irq+0xf8/0x1b0
>> [ 156.747784] ixgbe_open+0x3af/0x600 [ixgbe]
>> [ 156.797827] __dev_open+0xd8/0x160
>> [ 156.838503] dev_open+0x48/0x90
>> [ 156.876065] bond_enslave+0x2b6/0x12c0 [bonding]
>> [ 156.931310] ? vsscanf+0x5af/0x8e0
>> [ 156.971986] ? sscanf+0x4e/0x70
>> [ 157.009546] bond_option_slaves_set+0x112/0x1c0 [bonding]
>> [ 157.074148] __bond_opt_set+0xdc/0x320 [bonding]
>> [ 157.129389] __bond_opt_set_notify+0x2c/0x90 [bonding]
>> [ 157.190871] bond_opt_tryset_rtnl+0x56/0xa0 [bonding]
>> [ 157.251315] bonding_sysfs_store_option+0x52/0x90 [bonding]
>>
>> This patch marks these legacy vectors as assigned in irq_matrix
>> so that corresponding bits in percpu bitmaps get set and these
>> legacy vectors don't get reallocted.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Imran Khan <imran.f.khan@...cle.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> <formletter>
>
> This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
> stable kernel tree. Please read:
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!MYRIHQM1qBB0Raf823KeG1-OSUDCwlOyOxqTp5fzHTlxAL1H4LZW6XniBtajqKVb3w$
> for how to do this properly.
>
> </formletter>
>
Thanks for clarifying the process and providing the relevant doc. Looks
like CC-ing stable list for RFC patch was a mistake in first place. I
will wait for review comments and, if the patch gets included, will
inform via option 2 of the above mentioned document.
Thanks,
Imran
Powered by blists - more mailing lists