linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/190] 4.4.269-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YKZdmulG8YIguBss@kroah.com>
Date:   Thu, 20 May 2021 15:01:14 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/190] 4.4.269-rc1 review

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 04:30:26AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 5/20/21 2:21 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.269 release.
> > There are 190 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Sat, 22 May 2021 09:20:38 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> 
> All mips builds still fail.
> 
> Building mips:defconfig ... failed
> --------------
> Error log:
> In file included from include/linux/kernel.h:136,
>                  from include/asm-generic/bug.h:13,
>                  from arch/mips/include/asm/bug.h:41,
>                  from include/linux/bug.h:4,
>                  from include/linux/page-flags.h:9,
>                  from kernel/bounds.c:9:
> arch/mips/include/asm/div64.h:59:30: error: expected identifier or '(' before '{' token
>    59 | #define __div64_32(n, base) ({      \
>       |                              ^
> include/asm-generic/div64.h:35:17: note: in expansion of macro '__div64_32'
>    35 | extern uint32_t __div64_32(uint64_t *dividend, uint32_t divisor);
>       |                 ^~~~~~~~~~
> 
> It looks like the changes conflict with the code in include/asm-generic/div64.h.
> That code is completely different in later kernel versions.

Now dropped.

thanks,

greg k-h