[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210520133007.ybkc7ft5g5b3d7ds@ava.usersys.com>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 14:30:07 +0100
From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...hat.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
mhocko@...e.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm/page_alloc: bail out on fatal signal during
reclaim/compaction retry attempt
Matthew,
On Thu 2021-05-20 12:56 +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> While this is true, it's not really answering Andrew's question.
> What we want as part of the commit message is something like:
>
> "A customer experienced a low memory situation and sent their task a
> fatal signal. Instead of dying promptly, it looped in the page
> allocator failing to make progress because ..."
Apologies, I did not understand - I will follow up with a v4.
Kind regards,
--
Aaron Tomlin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists