[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2e79a2f8-1917-b7f2-4b19-2a742ba0e28a@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 07:36:53 -0700
From: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
To: Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>
Cc: hao.wu@...el.com, michal.simek@...inx.com,
linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fpga: generalize updating to partial and full
On 5/19/21 1:49 PM, Moritz Fischer wrote:
> Tom,
>
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 01:42:56PM -0700, trix@...hat.com wrote:
>> From: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
>>
>> There is a need to update the whole card.
>> The user area, the shell and even the card firmware.
>> This needs to be handled differently than the
>> existing partial updating in the fpga manager.
>>
>> Move the write_* ops out of fpga_manager_ops and
>> into a new fpga_manager_update_ops struct. Add
>> two update_ops back to fpga_manager_ops,
>> partial_update for the exiting functionality and
>> full_update for the new functionity.
> Partial and Full are somewhat loaded terms with FPGAs -- think partial
> reconfiguration vs full reconfiguration.
>
> How about 'persistent' and 'volatile' or something along those lines
> instead?
I think that only applies to xilinx, its all persistent for dfl.
How about calling it what it is.
partial_update -> partial_reconfiguration
full_update -> board_reimage
Tom
> - Moritz
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists