lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210520150526.GB641812@rocinante.localdomain>
Date:   Thu, 20 May 2021 17:05:26 +0200
From:   Krzysztof WilczyƄski <kw@...ux.com>
To:     Amey Narkhede <ameynarkhede03@...il.com>
Cc:     Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
        raphael.norwitz@...anix.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 2/7] PCI: Add pcie_reset_flr to follow calling
 convention of other reset methods

Hi Amey,

[...]
> +int pcie_reset_flr(struct pci_dev *dev, int probe)
> +{
> +	u32 cap;
> +
> +	if (dev->dev_flags & PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_FLR_RESET)
> +		return -ENOTTY;
> +
> +	pcie_capability_read_dword(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCAP, &cap);
> +	if (!(cap & PCI_EXP_DEVCAP_FLR))
> +		return -ENOTTY;
> +
> +	if (probe)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	return pcie_flr(dev);
> +}

Similarly to my suggestion in the first patch in the series, perhaps
using a boolean here would be an option.

Having said that, the following existing functions aren't doing it, so
for the sake of keeping things consistent it might not be the best
option, as per:

 static int pci_af_flr(struct pci_dev *dev, int probe)
 int nvme_disable_and_flr(struct pci_dev *dev, int probe)

Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ