[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YKaHUudJx2FJ2sO/@zn.tnic>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 17:59:25 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Joseph Richey <joerichey94@...il.com>
Cc: trivial@...nel.org, Joe Richey <joerichey@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...aro.org>,
Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@...ilicon.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-accelerators@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Don't use BIT() macro in UAPI headers
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 04:50:11AM -0700, Joseph Richey wrote:
> Running checkpatch.pl with --strict gives:
Yah, people must *remember* to use --strict.
> It should probably just recommend the _BITUL macro.
Right.
> Ahhhhh, I figured there was a more standard way. Will fix.
Yeah, Fixes: is very useful, as we've come to realize.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists