[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZhhNQupN_4Oh759bKL7sEM9M=yOW1y-mT69ugEkjRMZw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 18:00:04 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc: Corentin Labbe <clabbe@...libre.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mtd: partitions: redboot: fix style issues
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 5:36 PM Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com> wrote:
> Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote on Thu, 20 May 2021
> 17:24:26 +0200:
> > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 1:49 PM Corentin Labbe <clabbe@...libre.com> wrote:
> >
> > > This patch fixes easy checkpatch issues.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe@...libre.com>
> > (...)
> > > - uint32_t flash_base; // Address within FLASH of image
> > (...)
> > > + u32 flash_base; // Address within FLASH of image
> >
> > Does checkpatch complain about this? At one point the MTD maintainer
> > disliked the u32/u16/u8 types and explicitly wanted to use the C
> > standard library types, and it's the kind of eccentric maintainer
> > deviations we accommodate for.
>
> I suppose this happened quite some time ago? :)
>
> I've never heard Richard nor Boris complaining about it, nor will I.
Yes that was a specific David Woodhouse preference.
I'm too old!
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists