linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v2 10/20] x86/sev: Add a helper for the PVALIDATE instruction

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YKahvUZ3hAgWViqd@zn.tnic>
Date:   Thu, 20 May 2021 19:51:57 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, jroedel@...e.de, thomas.lendacky@....com,
        pbonzini@...hat.com, mingo@...hat.com, dave.hansen@...el.com,
        rientjes@...gle.com, seanjc@...gle.com, peterz@...radead.org,
        hpa@...or.com, tony.luck@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v2 10/20] x86/sev: Add a helper for the
 PVALIDATE instruction

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 12:44:50PM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> Hmm, I use the SIZEMISMATCH later in the patches.

You do, where? Maybe I don't see it.

> Since I was introducing the pvalidate in separate patch so decided to
> define all the return code.

You can define them in a comment so that it is clear what PVALIDATE
returns but not as defines when they're unused.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette