[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <921408d1-a399-7089-8647-f9617eb12919@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 13:05:15 -0500
From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: brijesh.singh@....com, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, jroedel@...e.de, thomas.lendacky@....com,
pbonzini@...hat.com, mingo@...hat.com, dave.hansen@...el.com,
rientjes@...gle.com, seanjc@...gle.com, peterz@...radead.org,
hpa@...or.com, tony.luck@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v2 11/20] x86/compressed: Add helper for
validating pages in the decompression stage
On 5/20/21 12:52 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 07:16:07AM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote:
>> @@ -278,12 +279,28 @@ static int set_clr_page_flags(struct x86_mapping_info *info,
>> if ((set | clr) & _PAGE_ENC)
>> clflush_page(address);
>>
>> + /*
>> + * If the encryption attribute is being cleared, then change the page state to
>> + * shared in the RMP entry. Change of the page state must be done before the
>> + * PTE updates.
>> + */
>> + if (clr & _PAGE_ENC)
>> + snp_set_page_shared(pte_pfn(*ptep) << PAGE_SHIFT);
> From the last review:
>
> The statement above already looks at clr - just merge the two together.
Maybe I am missing something, the statement above was executed for
either set or clr but the page shared need to happen only for clr. So,
from code readability point I kept it outside of that if().
Otherwise we may have to do something like.
...
if ((set | clr) & _PAGE_EN) {
if (clr)
snp_set_page_shared(pte_pfn(*ptep) << PAGE_SHIFT);
}
I am okay with above is the preferred approach.
>
>> @@ -136,6 +137,55 @@ static inline bool sev_snp_enabled(void)
>> return sev_status_val & MSR_AMD64_SEV_SNP_ENABLED ? true : false;
>> }
>>
>> +static void snp_page_state_change(unsigned long paddr, int op)
> From the last review:
>
> no need for too many prefixes on static functions - just call this one
> __change_page_state() or so, so that the below one can be called...
I guess I still kept the "snp" prefix because vmgexit was named that
way. Based on your feedback, I am droping the "SNP" prefix from the
VMGEXIT and will update it as well.
>> +{
>> + u64 val;
>> +
>> + if (!sev_snp_enabled())
>> + return;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * If the page is getting changed from private to shard then invalidate the page
> shared
>
> And you can write this a lot shorter
>
> * If private -> shared, ...
>
>> + * before requesting the state change in the RMP table.
>> + */
>> + if ((op == SNP_PAGE_STATE_SHARED) && pvalidate(paddr, RMP_PG_SIZE_4K, 0))
>> + goto e_pvalidate;
>> +
>> + /* Issue VMGEXIT to change the page state in RMP table. */
>> + sev_es_wr_ghcb_msr(GHCB_MSR_PSC_REQ_GFN(paddr >> PAGE_SHIFT, op));
>> + VMGEXIT();
>> +
>> + /* Read the response of the VMGEXIT. */
>> + val = sev_es_rd_ghcb_msr();
>> + if ((GHCB_RESP_CODE(val) != GHCB_MSR_PSC_RESP) || GHCB_MSR_PSC_RESP_VAL(val))
>> + goto e_psc;
> That label is used only once - just do the termination here directly and
> remove it.
Noted.
>
> Thx.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists