linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: emxx_udc: Fixed coding style in places where lines should not end in '('

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a1c0247c-9cfe-b03a-86eb-a8313be25e55@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 21 May 2021 00:43:16 +0530
From:   Hriday Hegde <hridayhegde1999@...il.com>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Alex Dewar <alex.dewar90@...il.com>,
        Sean Behan <codebam@...eup.net>,
        Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: emxx_udc: Fixed coding style in places where
 lines should not end in '('

On 20-05-2021 23:48, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 10:46:57AM -0700, Hriday Hegde wrote:
>> The fixes were for the following checkpatch outputs:
>>
>> CHECK: Lines should not end with a '('
>> 1076: FILE: drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.c:1076:
>> +				_nbu2ss_writel(
>>
>> CHECK: Lines should not end with a '('
>> 1228: FILE: drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.c:1228:
>> +		length = _nbu2ss_readl(
>>
>> CHECK: Lines should not end with a '('
>> 1465: FILE: drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.c:1465:
>> +			regdata = _nbu2ss_readl(
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hriday Hegde <hridayhegde1999@...il.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.c | 10 ++++------
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.c b/drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.c
>> index 741147a4f0fe..8364316c1d25 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.c
>> @@ -1073,8 +1073,8 @@ static int _nbu2ss_epn_in_pio(struct nbu2ss_udc *udc, struct nbu2ss_ep *ep,
>>  		i_word_length = length / sizeof(u32);
>>  		if (i_word_length > 0) {
>>  			for (i = 0; i < i_word_length; i++) {
>> -				_nbu2ss_writel(
>> -					&preg->EP_REGS[ep->epnum - 1].EP_WRITE,
>> +				_nbu2ss_writel(&preg->EP_REGS[ep->epnum - 1]
>> +					.EP_WRITE,
>>  					p_buf_32->dw);
> No, this is worse than before.
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
Yes sorry, didn't really take into account readability.

Thanks
Hriday