[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210520191901.1272423-1-arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 22:18:57 +0300
From: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@...persky.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@...persky.com>,
Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@...are.com>,
Norbert Slusarek <nslusarek@....net>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Andra Paraschiv <andraprs@...zon.com>
CC: <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<oxffffaa@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v10 14/18] virtio/vsock: enable SEQPACKET for transport
To make transport work with SOCK_SEQPACKET two updates were
added:
1) SOCK_SEQPACKET ops for virtio transport and 'seqpacket_allow()'
callback.
2) Handling of SEQPACKET bit: guest tries to negotiate it with vhost.
Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@...persky.com>
---
v9 -> v10:
1) Use 'virtio_has_feature()' to check feature bit.
2) Move assignment to 'seqpacket_allow' before 'rcu_assign_pointer()'.
net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
index 2700a63ab095..bc5ee8df723a 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ struct virtio_vsock {
struct virtio_vsock_event event_list[8];
u32 guest_cid;
+ bool seqpacket_allow;
};
static u32 virtio_transport_get_local_cid(void)
@@ -443,6 +444,8 @@ static void virtio_vsock_rx_done(struct virtqueue *vq)
queue_work(virtio_vsock_workqueue, &vsock->rx_work);
}
+static bool virtio_transport_seqpacket_allow(u32 remote_cid);
+
static struct virtio_transport virtio_transport = {
.transport = {
.module = THIS_MODULE,
@@ -469,6 +472,10 @@ static struct virtio_transport virtio_transport = {
.stream_is_active = virtio_transport_stream_is_active,
.stream_allow = virtio_transport_stream_allow,
+ .seqpacket_dequeue = virtio_transport_seqpacket_dequeue,
+ .seqpacket_enqueue = virtio_transport_seqpacket_enqueue,
+ .seqpacket_allow = virtio_transport_seqpacket_allow,
+
.notify_poll_in = virtio_transport_notify_poll_in,
.notify_poll_out = virtio_transport_notify_poll_out,
.notify_recv_init = virtio_transport_notify_recv_init,
@@ -485,6 +492,19 @@ static struct virtio_transport virtio_transport = {
.send_pkt = virtio_transport_send_pkt,
};
+static bool virtio_transport_seqpacket_allow(u32 remote_cid)
+{
+ struct virtio_vsock *vsock;
+ bool seqpacket_allow;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ vsock = rcu_dereference(the_virtio_vsock);
+ seqpacket_allow = vsock->seqpacket_allow;
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ return seqpacket_allow;
+}
+
static void virtio_transport_rx_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct virtio_vsock *vsock =
@@ -608,6 +628,9 @@ static int virtio_vsock_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
vsock->event_run = true;
mutex_unlock(&vsock->event_lock);
+ if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET))
+ vsock->seqpacket_allow = true;
+
vdev->priv = vsock;
rcu_assign_pointer(the_virtio_vsock, vsock);
@@ -695,6 +718,7 @@ static struct virtio_device_id id_table[] = {
};
static unsigned int features[] = {
+ VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET
};
static struct virtio_driver virtio_vsock_driver = {
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists