linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] cxl/mem: Reserve all device regions at once

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210520194432.GD1837122@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 20 May 2021 12:44:32 -0700
From:   Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
To:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc:     Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@...el.com>,
        Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
        Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] cxl/mem: Reserve all device regions at once

On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 06:00:51PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 3:37 PM <ira.weiny@...el.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
> >
> > In order to remap individual register sets each bar region must be
> > reserved prior to mapping.  Because the details of individual register
> > sets are contained within the BARs themselves, the bar must be mapped 2
> > times, once to extract this information and a second time for each
> > register set.
> >
> > Rather than attempt to reserve each BAR individually and track if that
> > bar has been reserved.  Open code pcim_iomap_regions() by first
> > reserving all memory regions on the device and then mapping the bars
> > individually as needed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/cxl/pci.c | 14 +++++++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cxl/pci.c b/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> > index 191603b4e10b..40016709b310 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> > @@ -926,9 +926,9 @@ static void __iomem *cxl_mem_map_regblock(struct cxl_mem *cxlm, u32 reg_lo, u32
> >  {
> >         struct pci_dev *pdev = cxlm->pdev;
> >         struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > +       void __iomem *rc;
> >         u64 offset;
> >         u8 bar;
> > -       int rc;
> >
> >         offset = ((u64)reg_hi << 32) | (reg_lo & CXL_REGLOC_ADDR_MASK);
> >         bar = FIELD_GET(CXL_REGLOC_BIR_MASK, reg_lo);
> > @@ -940,13 +940,14 @@ static void __iomem *cxl_mem_map_regblock(struct cxl_mem *cxlm, u32 reg_lo, u32
> >                 return (void __iomem *)ERR_PTR(-ENXIO);
> >         }
> >
> > -       rc = pcim_iomap_regions(pdev, BIT(bar), pci_name(pdev));
> > -       if (rc) {
> > +       rc = pcim_iomap(pdev, bar, 0);
> 
> It is odd that the temporary region pinning uses non-pcim, but the
> temporary mapping using pcim.

The idea of this series was to have only the final mappings be managed. But
this particular patch does not make that change.  Therefore I continue
using pcim_iomap() for this patch.

> 
> > +       if (!rc) {
> >                 dev_err(dev, "failed to map registers\n");
> > -               return (void __iomem *)ERR_PTR(rc);
> > +               return (void __iomem *)ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> 
> I think since this support is a bug/compatibility fix it should
> probably be rebased to current cxl.git#next. If you still end up
> needing to return an __iomem ERR_PTR() then use IOMEM_ERR_PTR.

Actually the type of rc has changed and I think it is best to just 'return rc;'
here.

Also, in a side conversation with Dan it seems the name would be more clear.
So I will change it.

> 
> >         }
> >
> > -       dev_dbg(dev, "Mapped CXL Memory Device resource\n");
> > +       dev_dbg(dev, "Mapped CXL Memory Device resource bar %u @ 0x%llx\n",
> 
> s/0x%llx/%#llx/

ok

> 
> > +               bar, offset);
> >
> >         return pcim_iomap_table(pdev)[bar] + offset;
> >  }
> > @@ -999,6 +1000,9 @@ static int cxl_mem_setup_regs(struct cxl_mem *cxlm)
> >                 return -ENXIO;
> >         }
> >
> > +       if (pci_request_mem_regions(pdev, pci_name(pdev)))
> 
> This tells me this patch is too fine grained and can't stand alone
> because it is missing the corresponding call to
> pci_release_mem_regions(). Ideally this would be kept in the same
> scope as the temporary io mapping.

Ok, I was a bit confused why I did not need this but I don't.

Dan and I discussed this offline and because pcim_enable_device() is called all
pci functions are automatically managed.

So the core will call pci_release_mem_regions() automatically for me.  It took
a bit of time for us to understand where the release call was.

I'll add a comment to this to make this more clear.

Ira

> 
> > +               return -ENODEV;
> > +
> >         /* Get the size of the Register Locator DVSEC */
> >         pci_read_config_dword(pdev, regloc + PCI_DVSEC_HEADER1, &regloc_size);
> >         regloc_size = FIELD_GET(PCI_DVSEC_HEADER1_LENGTH_MASK, regloc_size);
> > --
> > 2.28.0.rc0.12.gb6a658bd00c9
> >