[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87wnrtnpko.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 14:00:07 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, patches@...nsource.cirrus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Documentation build warning fixes
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org> writes:
> Hi Jon,
>
> This small series contain a series of fixes for the documentation. it is
> against your docs-next branch.
>
> Three of the patches fix duplicated symbols at the ABI documents.
> There are still some ABI warnings from IIO, but all but one were
> already fixed at linux-next. So, hopefully, after having everything
> merged, the ABI warnings will be solved.
>
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab (10):
> docs: update sysfs-platform_profile.rst reference
> docs: vcpu-requests.rst: fix reference for atomic ops
> docs: translations/zh_CN: fix a typo at 8.Conclusion.rst
> docs: sched-bwc.rst: fix a typo on a doc name
> docs: update pin-control.rst references
> docs: virt: api.rst: fix a pointer to SGX documentation
> docs: ABI: iommu: remove duplicated definition for
> sysfs-kernel-iommu_groups
> docs: ABI: sysfs-class-backlight: unify ambient light zone nodes
> docs: ABI: sysfs-class-led-trigger-pattern: remove repeat duplication
> iio: documentation: fix a typo
Seems like good stuff. The last patch in the series, though, adds a
warning:
Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio:799: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.
So I left that one out and applied the rest.
Thanks,
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists