lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87sg2hnpbn.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
Date:   Thu, 20 May 2021 14:05:32 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>,
        Marc Koderer <marc@...erer.com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
        Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
        Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
        Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
        Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Xuefeng Li <lixuefeng@...ngson.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] Fix typos in samples/kprobes/kprobe_example.c

Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn> writes:

> Split the v3 patch [1] into two patches suggested by Masami Hiramatsu.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1429021/
>
> Tiezhu Yang (2):
>   samples/kprobes: Fix typo in handler_fault()
>   samples/kprobes: Fix typo in handler_post()
>
>  samples/kprobes/kprobe_example.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

I've applied the set, with one tweak.  The first patch included this
line:

  Fixes: 804defea1c02 ("Kprobes: move kprobe examples to samples/")

But that patch, as its title suggests, simply moved the code to a
different place; it didn't introduce that particular mistake.  So I took
the Fixes tag out.

Thanks,

jon

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ