linux-kernel - Re: (subset) [PATCH 1/2] regulator: core: resolve supply for boot-on/always-on regulators

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 20 May 2021 22:08:02 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH 1/2] regulator: core: resolve supply for boot-on/always-on regulators

On Thu, 20 May 2021 01:12:23 +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> For the boot-on/always-on regulators the set_machine_constrainst() is
> called before resolving rdev->supply. Thus the code would try to enable
> rdev before enabling supplying regulator. Enforce resolving supply
> regulator before enabling rdev.

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/2] regulator: core: resolve supply for boot-on/always-on regulators
      commit: 98e48cd9283dbac0e1445ee780889f10b3d1db6a

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark