[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6d508f80-4a76-64c2-9772-da23bb467e0b@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 14:28:35 -0700
From: "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan"
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <knsathya@...nel.org>,
Raj Ashok <ashok.raj@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 27/32] x86/tdx: Exclude Shared bit from __PHYSICAL_MASK
On 5/20/21 2:23 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> Sathya has even mis-typed "tdx" instead of "tdg" this in his own
> changelogs up to this point. That massively weakens the argument that
> "tdg" is a good idea.
It is not a typo. But when we did the initial rename from "tdx_" -> "tdg_",
somehow I missed the change log change. That's why I am bit reluctant
to go for another rename (since we have scan change log, comments and code)
in all the patches.
--
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists