[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPNVh5eV+CtY74_JMv6_Bm5aCVBh_F9hkWLT6v3BT=H0UwodUg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 14:38:33 -0700
From: Peter Oskolkov <posk@...gle.com>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-api <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Peter Oskolkov <posk@...k.io>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrei Vagin <avagin@...gle.com>,
Jim Newsome <jnewsome@...project.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v0.1 0/9] UMCG early preview/RFC patchset
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 2:17 PM Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> wrote:
>
> Peter Oskolkov <posk@...gle.com> writes:
>
> > As indicated earlier in the FUTEX_SWAP patchset:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200722234538.166697-1-posk@posk.io/
> >
> > "Google Fibers" is a userspace scheduling framework
> > used widely and successfully at Google to improve in-process workload
> > isolation and response latencies. We are working on open-sourcing
> > this framework, and UMCG (User-Managed Concurrency Groups) kernel
> > patches are intended as the foundation of this.
>
> So I have to ask...is there *any* documentation out there on what this
> is and how people are supposed to use it? Shockingly, typing "Google
> fibers" into Google leads to a less than fully joyful outcome... This
> won't be easy for anybody to review if they have to start by
> reverse-engineering what it's supposed to do.
Hi Jonathan,
There is this Linux Plumbers video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXuZi9aeGTw
And the pdf: http://pdxplumbers.osuosl.org/2013/ocw//system/presentations/1653/original/LPC%20-%20User%20Threading.pdf
I did not reference them in the patchset because links to sites other
than kernel.org are strongly discouraged... I will definitely add a
documentation patch.
Feel free to reach out to me directly or through this LKML thread if
you have any questions.
Do you think a documentation patch would be useful at this point, as
opposed to a free-form email discussion?
Thanks,
Peter
>
> Thanks,
>
> jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists