[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210520010254.GC22836@lothringen>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 03:02:54 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, rcu@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] rcu/nocb: Start moving nocb code to its own plugin
file
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 08:55:08AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 02:09:28AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > tree_plugin.h is now gathering not only the (no)preempt-rcu specifics
> > but also other features like NO_CB. As the latter has grown quite in
> > complexity and volume, it's may be a good idea to start moving the
> > related code to its own file so we don't need to browse thousand lines
> > to find what we need.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
>
> Applied with the usual wordsmithing, thank you!
>
> But for consistency with the other similar files included by
> kernel/rcu/tree.c, should the name instead be kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h?
Ah yes, I hesitated but tree_nocb.h is indeed more consistent. Can I let
you do the rename?
> Also, if Ingo and I are one the author list, shouldn't you be as well? ;-)
Heh, alright feel free to add the following as a fixup :-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/nocb.h b/kernel/rcu/nocb.h
index a7783923833e..bf2690ca5d2b 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/nocb.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/nocb.h
@@ -6,9 +6,11 @@
*
* Copyright Red Hat, 2009
* Copyright IBM Corporation, 2009
+ * Copyright SUSE, 2021
*
* Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
* Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
+ * Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
*/
#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU
Or perhaps you prefer a separate patch?
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists