[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1621499404-67756-1-git-send-email-feng.tang@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 16:30:00 +0800
From: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
To: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, ying.huang@...el.com,
Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
Subject: [RFC Patch v2 0/4] mm/mempolicy: some fix and semantics cleanup
Hi All,
We've posted v4 patchset introducing a new "perfer-many" memory policy
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1615952410-36895-1-git-send-email-feng.tang@intel.com/ ,
for which Michal Hocko gave many comments while pointing out some
problems, and we also found some semantics confusion about 'prefer'
and 'local' policy, as well as some duplicated code. This patchset
tries to address them. Please help to review, thanks!
- Feng
Feng Tang (4):
mm/mempolicy: skip nodemask intersect check for 'interleave' when oom
mm/mempolicy: unify the preprocessing for mbind and set_mempolicy
mm/mempolicy: don't handle MPOL_LOCAL like a fake MPOL_PREFERRED
policy
mm/mempolicy: kill MPOL_F_LOCAL bit
include/uapi/linux/mempolicy.h | 1 +
mm/mempolicy.c | 205 +++++++++++++++++++----------------------
2 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 108 deletions(-)
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists