linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.12 13/45] Input: elants_i2c - do not bind to i2c-hid compatible ACPI instantiated devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210520092053.952823292@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 20 May 2021 11:22:01 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.12 13/45] Input: elants_i2c - do not bind to i2c-hid compatible ACPI instantiated devices

From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>

[ Upstream commit 65299e8bfb24774e6340e93ae49f6626598917c8 ]

Several users have been reporting that elants_i2c gives several errors
during probe and that their touchscreen does not work on their Lenovo AMD
based laptops with a touchscreen with a ELAN0001 ACPI hardware-id:

[    0.550596] elants_i2c i2c-ELAN0001:00: i2c-ELAN0001:00 supply vcc33 not found, using dummy regulator
[    0.551836] elants_i2c i2c-ELAN0001:00: i2c-ELAN0001:00 supply vccio not found, using dummy regulator
[    0.560932] elants_i2c i2c-ELAN0001:00: elants_i2c_send failed (77 77 77 77): -121
[    0.562427] elants_i2c i2c-ELAN0001:00: software reset failed: -121
[    0.595925] elants_i2c i2c-ELAN0001:00: elants_i2c_send failed (77 77 77 77): -121
[    0.597974] elants_i2c i2c-ELAN0001:00: software reset failed: -121
[    0.621893] elants_i2c i2c-ELAN0001:00: elants_i2c_send failed (77 77 77 77): -121
[    0.622504] elants_i2c i2c-ELAN0001:00: software reset failed: -121
[    0.632650] elants_i2c i2c-ELAN0001:00: elants_i2c_send failed (4d 61 69 6e): -121
[    0.634256] elants_i2c i2c-ELAN0001:00: boot failed: -121
[    0.699212] elants_i2c i2c-ELAN0001:00: invalid 'hello' packet: 00 00 ff ff
[    1.630506] elants_i2c i2c-ELAN0001:00: Failed to read fw id: -121
[    1.645508] elants_i2c i2c-ELAN0001:00: unknown packet 00 00 ff ff

Despite these errors, the elants_i2c driver stays bound to the device
(it returns 0 from its probe method despite the errors), blocking the
i2c-hid driver from binding.

Manually unbinding the elants_i2c driver and binding the i2c-hid driver
makes the touchscreen work.

Check if the ACPI-fwnode for the touchscreen contains one of the i2c-hid
compatiblity-id strings and if it has the I2C-HID spec's DSM to get the
HID descriptor address, If it has both then make elants_i2c not bind,
so that the i2c-hid driver can bind.

This assumes that non of the (older) elan touchscreens which actually
need the elants_i2c driver falsely advertise an i2c-hid compatiblity-id
+ DSM in their ACPI-fwnodes. If some of them actually do have this
false advertising, then this change may lead to regressions.

While at it also drop the unnecessary DEVICE_NAME prefixing of the
"I2C check functionality error", dev_err already outputs the driver-name.

BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207759
Acked-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210405202756.16830-1-hdegoede@redhat.com

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/input/touchscreen/elants_i2c.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/elants_i2c.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/elants_i2c.c
index 5f7706febcb0..17540bdb1eaf 100644
--- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/elants_i2c.c
+++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/elants_i2c.c
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
 #include <linux/of.h>
 #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
 #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
+#include <linux/uuid.h>
 #include <asm/unaligned.h>
 
 /* Device, Driver information */
@@ -1334,6 +1335,40 @@ static void elants_i2c_power_off(void *_data)
 	}
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
+static const struct acpi_device_id i2c_hid_ids[] = {
+	{"ACPI0C50", 0 },
+	{"PNP0C50", 0 },
+	{ },
+};
+
+static const guid_t i2c_hid_guid =
+	GUID_INIT(0x3CDFF6F7, 0x4267, 0x4555,
+		  0xAD, 0x05, 0xB3, 0x0A, 0x3D, 0x89, 0x38, 0xDE);
+
+static bool elants_acpi_is_hid_device(struct device *dev)
+{
+	acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(dev);
+	union acpi_object *obj;
+
+	if (acpi_match_device_ids(ACPI_COMPANION(dev), i2c_hid_ids))
+		return false;
+
+	obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(handle, &i2c_hid_guid, 1, 1, NULL, ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER);
+	if (obj) {
+		ACPI_FREE(obj);
+		return true;
+	}
+
+	return false;
+}
+#else
+static bool elants_acpi_is_hid_device(struct device *dev)
+{
+	return false;
+}
+#endif
+
 static int elants_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
 			    const struct i2c_device_id *id)
 {
@@ -1342,9 +1377,14 @@ static int elants_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
 	unsigned long irqflags;
 	int error;
 
+	/* Don't bind to i2c-hid compatible devices, these are handled by the i2c-hid drv. */
+	if (elants_acpi_is_hid_device(&client->dev)) {
+		dev_warn(&client->dev, "This device appears to be an I2C-HID device, not binding\n");
+		return -ENODEV;
+	}
+
 	if (!i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter, I2C_FUNC_I2C)) {
-		dev_err(&client->dev,
-			"%s: i2c check functionality error\n", DEVICE_NAME);
+		dev_err(&client->dev, "I2C check functionality error\n");
 		return -ENXIO;
 	}
 
-- 
2.30.2