[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210520015704.489737-1-andrew@aj.id.au>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 11:27:04 +0930
From: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>
To: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Cc: dwaipayanray1@...il.com, lukas.bulwahn@...il.com, joe@...ches.com,
corbet@....net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] Documentation: checkpatch: Tweak BIT() macro include
While include/linux/bitops.h brings in the BIT() macro, it was moved to
include/linux/bits.h in [1]. Since [1] BIT() has moved again into
include/vdso/bits.h via [2].
I think the move to the vDSO header can be considered a implementation
detail, so for now update the checkpatch documentation to recommend use
of include/linux/bits.h.
[1] commit 8bd9cb51daac ("locking/atomics, asm-generic: Move some macros from <linux/bitops.h> to a new <linux/bits.h> file")
[2] commit 3945ff37d2f4 ("linux/bits.h: Extract common header for vDSO")
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>
---
Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst
index 51fed1bd72ec..59fcc9f627ea 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst
@@ -472,7 +472,7 @@ Macros, Attributes and Symbols
**BIT_MACRO**
Defines like: 1 << <digit> could be BIT(digit).
- The BIT() macro is defined in include/linux/bitops.h::
+ The BIT() macro is defined via include/linux/bits.h::
#define BIT(nr) (1UL << (nr))
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists