[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3bf4adf0-ed98-ab86-cd5a-efca3ea856bc@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 10:13:24 +0800
From: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
To: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next resend] sfc: farch: fix compile warning in
efx_farch_dimension_resources()
Hi,
On 2021/5/19 22:40, Edward Cree wrote:
> On 19/05/2021 03:11, Yang Yingliang wrote:
>> Fix the following kernel build warning when CONFIG_SFC_SRIOV is disabled:
>>
>> drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/farch.c: In function ‘efx_farch_dimension_resources’:
>> drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/farch.c:1671:21: warning: variable ‘buftbl_min’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
>> unsigned vi_count, buftbl_min, total_tx_channels;
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/farch.c | 9 +++++----
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/farch.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/farch.c
>> index 49df02ecee91..6048b08b89ec 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/farch.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/farch.c
>> @@ -1668,13 +1668,17 @@ void efx_farch_rx_pull_indir_table(struct efx_nic *efx)
>> */
>> void efx_farch_dimension_resources(struct efx_nic *efx, unsigned sram_lim_qw)
>> {
>> - unsigned vi_count, buftbl_min, total_tx_channels;
>> + unsigned vi_count, total_tx_channels;
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_SFC_SRIOV
>> struct siena_nic_data *nic_data = efx->nic_data;
>> + unsigned buftbl_min;
>> #endif
> As I said the first time you sent this:
> Reverse xmas tree is messed up here, please fix.
> Apart from that, LGTM.
Do you mean like this:
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/farch.c
b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/farch.c
index 6048b08b89ec..b16f04cf7223 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/farch.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/farch.c
@@ -1668,10 +1668,10 @@ void efx_farch_rx_pull_indir_table(struct
efx_nic *efx)
*/
void efx_farch_dimension_resources(struct efx_nic *efx, unsigned
sram_lim_qw)
{
- unsigned vi_count, total_tx_channels;
+ unsigned total_tx_channels, vi_count;
#ifdef CONFIG_SFC_SRIOV
- struct siena_nic_data *nic_data = efx->nic_data;
+ struct siena_nic_data *nic_data;
unsigned buftbl_min;
#endif
@@ -1679,6 +1679,7 @@ void efx_farch_dimension_resources(struct efx_nic
*efx, unsigned sram_lim_qw)
vi_count = max(efx->n_channels, total_tx_channels *
EFX_MAX_TXQ_PER_CHANNEL);
#ifdef CONFIG_SFC_SRIOV
+ nic_data = efx->nic_data;
/* Account for the buffer table entries backing the datapath channels
* and the descriptor caches for those channels.
*/
Thanks,
Yang
>
> -ed
>
>>
>> total_tx_channels = efx->n_tx_channels + efx->n_extra_tx_channels;
>> + vi_count = max(efx->n_channels, total_tx_channels * EFX_MAX_TXQ_PER_CHANNEL);
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SFC_SRIOV
>> /* Account for the buffer table entries backing the datapath channels
>> * and the descriptor caches for those channels.
>> */
>> @@ -1682,9 +1686,6 @@ void efx_farch_dimension_resources(struct efx_nic *efx, unsigned sram_lim_qw)
>> total_tx_channels * EFX_MAX_TXQ_PER_CHANNEL * EFX_MAX_DMAQ_SIZE +
>> efx->n_channels * EFX_MAX_EVQ_SIZE)
>> * sizeof(efx_qword_t) / EFX_BUF_SIZE);
>> - vi_count = max(efx->n_channels, total_tx_channels * EFX_MAX_TXQ_PER_CHANNEL);
>> -
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_SFC_SRIOV
>> if (efx->type->sriov_wanted) {
>> if (efx->type->sriov_wanted(efx)) {
>> unsigned vi_dc_entries, buftbl_free;
>>
> .
Powered by blists - more mailing lists