| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAMZfGtXC_UG9gUD58ezL02a+Gyry_d7WfEwKup6UMQjvNi3HdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 11:20:47 +0800
From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
To: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Xiongchun duan <duanxiongchun@...edance.com>,
"fam.zheng@...edance.com" <fam.zheng@...edance.com>,
"Singh, Balbir" <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
Alex Shi <alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [RFC PATCH v3 00/12] Use obj_cgroup APIs to charge
the LRU pages
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 10:17 PM Roman Gushchin <guro@...com> wrote:
>
> Hi Muchun!
>
> It looks like the writeback problem will be solved in a different way, which will not require generalization of the obj_cgroup api to the cgroup level. It’s not fully confirmed yet though. We still might wanna do this generalization lingn-term, but as now I have no objections for continuing the work on your patchset. I’m on pto this week, but will take a deeper look at your patches early next week. Sorry for the delay.
Waiting on your review. Thanks Roman.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On May 18, 2021, at 06:50, Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com> wrote:
> >
> > Ping...
> >
> > Hi Johannes and Roman,
> >
> > Any suggestions on this patch set?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 3:01 PM Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> This is v3 based on the top of the series[1] (memcontrol code cleanup and
> >> simplification). Roman is working on the generalization of obj_cgroup API.
> >> But before that, hope someone can review this patches for correctness.
> >>
> >> Since the following patchsets applied. All the kernel memory are charged
> >> with the new APIs of obj_cgroup.
> >>
> >> [v17,00/19] The new cgroup slab memory controller[2]
> >> [v5,0/7] Use obj_cgroup APIs to charge kmem pages[3]
> >>
> >> But user memory allocations (LRU pages) pinning memcgs for a long time -
> >> it exists at a larger scale and is causing recurring problems in the real
> >> world: page cache doesn't get reclaimed for a long time, or is used by the
> >> second, third, fourth, ... instance of the same job that was restarted into
> >> a new cgroup every time. Unreclaimable dying cgroups pile up, waste memory,
> >> and make page reclaim very inefficient.
> >>
> >> We can convert LRU pages and most other raw memcg pins to the objcg direction
> >> to fix this problem, and then the LRU pages will not pin the memcgs.
> >>
> >> This patchset aims to make the LRU pages to drop the reference to memory
> >> cgroup by using the APIs of obj_cgroup. Finally, we can see that the number
> >> of the dying cgroups will not increase if we run the following test script.
> >>
> >> ```bash
> >> #!/bin/bash
> >>
> >> cat /proc/cgroups | grep memory
> >>
> >> cd /sys/fs/cgroup/memory
> >>
> >> for i in range{1..500}
> >> do
> >> mkdir test
> >> echo $$ > test/cgroup.procs
> >> sleep 60 &
> >> echo $$ > cgroup.procs
> >> echo `cat test/cgroup.procs` > cgroup.procs
> >> rmdir test
> >> done
> >>
> >> cat /proc/cgroups | grep memory
> >> ```
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20210417043538.9793-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com/
> >> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20200623015846.1141975-1-guro@fb.com/
> >> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20210319163821.20704-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com/
> >>
> >> Changlogs in RFC v3:
> >> 1. Drop the code cleanup and simplification patches. Gather those patches
> >> into a separate series[1].
> >> 2. Rework patch #1 suggested by Johannes.
> >>
> >> Changlogs in RFC v2:
> >> 1. Collect Acked-by tags by Johannes. Thanks.
> >> 2. Rework lruvec_holds_page_lru_lock() suggested by Johannes. Thanks.
> >> 3. Fix move_pages_to_lru().
> >>
> >> Muchun Song (12):
> >> mm: memcontrol: move the objcg infrastructure out of CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
> >> mm: memcontrol: introduce compact_lock_page_lruvec_irqsave
> >> mm: memcontrol: make lruvec lock safe when the LRU pages reparented
> >> mm: vmscan: rework move_pages_to_lru()
> >> mm: thp: introduce lock/unlock_split_queue{_irqsave}()
> >> mm: thp: make deferred split queue lock safe when the LRU pages
> >> reparented
> >> mm: memcontrol: make all the callers of page_memcg() safe
> >> mm: memcontrol: introduce memcg_reparent_ops
> >> mm: memcontrol: use obj_cgroup APIs to charge the LRU pages
> >> mm: memcontrol: rename {un}lock_page_memcg() to {un}lock_page_objcg()
> >> mm: lru: add VM_BUG_ON_PAGE to lru maintenance function
> >> mm: lru: use lruvec lock to serialize memcg changes
> >>
> >> Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/memory.rst | 2 +-
> >> fs/buffer.c | 13 +-
> >> fs/fs-writeback.c | 23 +-
> >> fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 4 +-
> >> include/linux/memcontrol.h | 182 ++++----
> >> include/linux/mm_inline.h | 6 +
> >> mm/compaction.c | 36 +-
> >> mm/filemap.c | 2 +-
> >> mm/huge_memory.c | 171 ++++++--
> >> mm/memcontrol.c | 562 ++++++++++++++++++-------
> >> mm/migrate.c | 4 +
> >> mm/page-writeback.c | 24 +-
> >> mm/page_io.c | 5 +-
> >> mm/rmap.c | 14 +-
> >> mm/swap.c | 46 +-
> >> mm/vmscan.c | 56 ++-
> >> 16 files changed, 795 insertions(+), 355 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.11.0
> >>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists