lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YKf5raJ+hth18BsH@debian>
Date:   Fri, 21 May 2021 19:19:25 +0100
From:   Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/45] 5.10.39-rc2 review

Hi Greg,

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 05:23:18PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.39 release.
> There are 45 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 22 May 2021 15:22:29 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Build test:
mips (gcc version 11.1.1 20210430): 63 configs -> no new failure
arm (gcc version 11.1.1 20210430): 105 configs -> no new failure
x86_64 (gcc version 10.2.1 20210110): 2 configs -> no failure

Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression.

Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@...ethink.co.uk>

--
Regards
Sudip

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ