[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YKf5raJ+hth18BsH@debian>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 19:19:25 +0100
From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/45] 5.10.39-rc2 review
Hi Greg,
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 05:23:18PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.39 release.
> There are 45 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 22 May 2021 15:22:29 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test:
mips (gcc version 11.1.1 20210430): 63 configs -> no new failure
arm (gcc version 11.1.1 20210430): 105 configs -> no new failure
x86_64 (gcc version 10.2.1 20210110): 2 configs -> no failure
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression.
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@...ethink.co.uk>
--
Regards
Sudip
Powered by blists - more mailing lists