linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/9] tty: hvc_console: Fix coding style issues of block comments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <07453180-0aa4-e260-a50d-23d27973907b@huawei.com>
Date:   Fri, 21 May 2021 10:23:15 +0800
From:   Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@...wei.com>
To:     Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
CC:     <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        <linuxarm@...neuler.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] tty: hvc_console: Fix coding style issues of block
 comments


Hi Johan,

On 2021/5/20 21:52, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 09:21:25PM +0800, Xiaofei Tan wrote:
>
>>> Checkpatch already has too many checks IMO and I'm a bit surprised that
>>> it doesn't check this already. Perhaps it's because you used the -f to
>>> run checkpatch on in-kernel code, which you should not.
>>>
>>>>> Second, that sentence is not capitalised so why do add a period?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> How about capitalize the sentence, or just remove the period ?
>>>
>>> How about just leaving this unchanged?
>>
>> OK
>> And I will keep the patch 8/9, and combine space issues into
>> one new patch, and remove the others.
>
> Yeah, 8/9 is arguably a fix even if it's for a very minor issue
> (repeated words in a comment).
>
> It doesn't look like any of the white space issues are worth fixing,
> though. Such pedantry can usually be addressed when the code in question
> is being modified for other reasons.
>

OK, it is reasonable. thanks.

> Johan
>
> .
>