[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fc6540fa-1945-a15d-239d-e87bb4d3fa9e@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 20:53:56 +0200
From: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@...il.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/fb-helper: improve DRM fbdev emulation device names
Hi
Am 21.05.21 um 19:18 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas:
> On 5/21/21 6:53 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>>>
>>> So what with all the drivers which do _not_ have drm in their name? Also
>>> I'm never sure how much these are uapi or not ...
>>
>
> That someone could threat as an uapi is a fair point indeed.
>
>> Why do we need a suffix anyway?
>>
>
> Yes, I thought the same and was torn about posting a patch to just remove
> the suffix. I don't think users care that much if is a fb device from a
> fbdev driver or a DRM driver using the fbdev emulation.
Yup. I don't see how anything in userspace would depend on the exact
name; especially since fbdev emulation only provides basic features.
(I'd welcome a counter examples that proves me wrong.)
IMHO we can risk it to remove the suffix entirely. But that needs an ack
from Daniel or Dave.
Best regards
Thomas
>
>>> -Daniel
>>>
>
> Best regards,
>
--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
Download attachment "OpenPGP_signature" of type "application/pgp-signature" (841 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists