[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f92cf223-9cd4-9ea5-0152-d3a3d012cc31@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 20:25:24 +0100
From: Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:ACPI COMPONENT ARCHITECTURE (ACPICA)" <devel@...ica.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Mark Gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
Erik Kaneda <erik.kaneda@...el.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] ACPI: scan: Add function to fetch dependent of
acpi device
Hi Rafael
On 20/05/2021 19:55, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 8:33 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 4:11 PM Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com> wrote:
>>> In some ACPI tables we encounter, devices use the _DEP method to assert
>>> a dependence on other ACPI devices as opposed to the OpRegions that the
>>> specification intends. We need to be able to find those devices "from"
>>> the dependee, so add a callback and a wrapper to walk over the
>>> acpi_dep_list and return the dependent ACPI device.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>> Changes since v3:
>>>
>>> Both new functions were renamed.
>>>
>>> drivers/acpi/scan.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 1 +
>>> 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
>>> index 195635c3462b..1a76fbdfa669 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
>>> @@ -2105,6 +2105,21 @@ static void acpi_bus_attach(struct acpi_device *device, bool first_pass)
>>> device->handler->hotplug.notify_online(device);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static int acpi_return_dep_dev(struct acpi_dep_data *dep, void *data)
>> What about calling this acpi_get_first_consumer_cb()?
> Or acpi_dev_get_first_consumer_dev_cb() if you want to be super-precise?
Sure; fine by me, and same for the other function
Powered by blists - more mailing lists