| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 22 May 2021 02:02:00 +0530
From: Shreyansh Chouhan <chouhan.shreyansh630@...il.com>
To: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, fabioaiuto83@...il.com,
ross.schm.dev@...il.com, straube.linux@...il.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: staging: rtl8723bs: questions regarding refactor for reducing
indents in core/rtw_wlan_util.c
Hi,
I am trying to fix the following warnings by checkpatch for the file
core/rtw_wlan_util.c:
WARNING: Too many leading tabs - consider code refactoring
#887: FILE: rtw_wlan_util.c:887:
+ if ((edca[j] >> 16) > (edca[i] >> 16))
WARNING: Too many leading tabs - consider code refactoring
#1529: FILE: rtw_wlan_util.c:1529:
+ if (pIE->data[5] & RT_HT_CAP_USE_92SE)
WARNING: Too many leading tabs - consider code refactoring
#1537: FILE: rtw_wlan_util.c:1537:
+ if (pIE->data[6] & RT_HT_CAP_USE_JAGUAR_BCUT)
WARNING: Too many leading tabs - consider code refactoring
#1540: FILE: rtw_wlan_util.c:1540:
+ if (pIE->data[6] & RT_HT_CAP_USE_JAGUAR_CCUT)
Would a patch similar to this diff be fine?
I am unsure about the names of these functions. I tried searching about
what the code is doing, and came accross probing, authentication and
association phases between a station and an AP. However, I wasn't able
to find anything about what the code is trying to do by updating the
edca ac parameters.
If these names are not fine, (which they probably aren't,) please
suggest better names. It might help me better understand what the code
in these functions actually does.
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_wlan_util.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_wlan_util.c
index ce47ef4edea0..c4dda6a585f3 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_wlan_util.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_wlan_util.c
@@ -777,6 +777,32 @@ int WMM_param_handler(struct adapter *padapter, struct ndis_80211_var_ie *pIE)
return true;
}
For the following function, I read the comment right next to the
declaration of wmm_para_seq in the xmit_priv struct (include/rtw_xmit.h
line #270) and saw that the code essentially was a bubble sort,
(mentioned after this paragraph,) and kept the name sort_wmm_ac_params.
/*
* sequence for wmm ac parameter strength
* from large to small. it's value is 0->vo,
* 1->vi, 2->be, 3->bk.
*/
+static void sort_wmm_ac_params(u32 *inx, u32 *edca)
+{
+ u32 i, j, change_inx = false;
+
+ /* entry indx: 0->vo, 1->vi, 2->be, 3->bk. */
+ for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
+ for (j = i + 1; j < 4; j++) {
+ /* compare CW and AIFS */
+ if ((edca[j] & 0xFFFF) < (edca[i] & 0xFFFF)) {
+ change_inx = true;
+ } else if ((edca[j] & 0xFFFF) == (edca[i] & 0xFFFF)) {
+ /* compare TXOP */
+ if ((edca[j] >> 16) > (edca[i] >> 16))
+ change_inx = true;
+ }
+
+ if (change_inx) {
+ swap(edca[i], edca[j]);
+ swap(inx[i], inx[j]);
+
+ change_inx = false;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+}
+
void WMMOnAssocRsp(struct adapter *padapter)
{
u8 ACI, ACM, AIFS, ECWMin, ECWMax, aSifsTime;
@@ -873,35 +899,8 @@ void WMMOnAssocRsp(struct adapter *padapter)
inx[0] = 0; inx[1] = 1; inx[2] = 2; inx[3] = 3;
- if (pregpriv->wifi_spec == 1) {
- u32 j, tmp, change_inx = false;
-
- /* entry indx: 0->vo, 1->vi, 2->be, 3->bk. */
- for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
- for (j = i+1; j < 4; j++) {
- /* compare CW and AIFS */
- if ((edca[j] & 0xFFFF) < (edca[i] & 0xFFFF)) {
- change_inx = true;
- } else if ((edca[j] & 0xFFFF) == (edca[i] & 0xFFFF)) {
- /* compare TXOP */
- if ((edca[j] >> 16) > (edca[i] >> 16))
- change_inx = true;
- }
-
- if (change_inx) {
- tmp = edca[i];
- edca[i] = edca[j];
- edca[j] = tmp;
-
- tmp = inx[i];
- inx[i] = inx[j];
- inx[j] = tmp;
-
- change_inx = false;
- }
- }
- }
- }
+ if (pregpriv->wifi_spec == 1)
+ sort_wmm_ac_params(inx, edca);
for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
pxmitpriv->wmm_para_seq[i] = inx[i];
@@ -1496,6 +1495,34 @@ void set_sta_rate(struct adapter *padapter, struct sta_info *psta)
Update_RA_Entry(padapter, psta);
}
I tried naming the following function according to what I think it is doing.
+static u32 get_realtek_assoc_AP_vendor(struct ndis_80211_var_ie *pIE)
+{
+ u32 Vendor = HT_IOT_PEER_REALTEK;
+
+ if (pIE->Length >= 5) {
+ // get_vendor(pIE->data);
+ if (pIE->data[4] == 1)
+ /* if (pIE->data[5] & RT_HT_CAP_USE_LONG_PREAMBLE) */
+ /* bssDesc->BssHT.RT2RT_HT_Mode |= RT_HT_CAP_USE_LONG_PREAMBLE; */
+ if (pIE->data[5] & RT_HT_CAP_USE_92SE)
+ /* bssDesc->BssHT.RT2RT_HT_Mode |= RT_HT_CAP_USE_92SE; */
+ Vendor = HT_IOT_PEER_REALTEK_92SE;
+
+ if (pIE->data[5] & RT_HT_CAP_USE_SOFTAP)
+ Vendor = HT_IOT_PEER_REALTEK_SOFTAP;
+
+ if (pIE->data[4] == 2) {
+ if (pIE->data[6] & RT_HT_CAP_USE_JAGUAR_BCUT)
+ Vendor = HT_IOT_PEER_REALTEK_JAGUAR_BCUTAP;
+
+ if (pIE->data[6] & RT_HT_CAP_USE_JAGUAR_CCUT)
+ Vendor = HT_IOT_PEER_REALTEK_JAGUAR_CCUTAP;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return Vendor;
+}
+
unsigned char check_assoc_AP(u8 *pframe, uint len)
{
unsigned int i;
@@ -1519,29 +1546,7 @@ unsigned char check_assoc_AP(u8 *pframe, uint len)
} else if (!memcmp(pIE->data, CISCO_OUI, 3)) {
return HT_IOT_PEER_CISCO;
} else if (!memcmp(pIE->data, REALTEK_OUI, 3)) {
- u32 Vender = HT_IOT_PEER_REALTEK;
-
- if (pIE->Length >= 5) {
- if (pIE->data[4] == 1)
- /* if (pIE->data[5] & RT_HT_CAP_USE_LONG_PREAMBLE) */
- /* bssDesc->BssHT.RT2RT_HT_Mode |= RT_HT_CAP_USE_LONG_PREAMBLE; */
- if (pIE->data[5] & RT_HT_CAP_USE_92SE)
- /* bssDesc->BssHT.RT2RT_HT_Mode |= RT_HT_CAP_USE_92SE; */
- Vender = HT_IOT_PEER_REALTEK_92SE;
-
- if (pIE->data[5] & RT_HT_CAP_USE_SOFTAP)
- Vender = HT_IOT_PEER_REALTEK_SOFTAP;
-
- if (pIE->data[4] == 2) {
- if (pIE->data[6] & RT_HT_CAP_USE_JAGUAR_BCUT)
- Vender = HT_IOT_PEER_REALTEK_JAGUAR_BCUTAP;
-
- if (pIE->data[6] & RT_HT_CAP_USE_JAGUAR_CCUT)
- Vender = HT_IOT_PEER_REALTEK_JAGUAR_CCUTAP;
- }
- }
-
- return Vender;
+ return get_realtek_assoc_AP_vendor(pIE);
} else if (!memcmp(pIE->data, AIRGOCAP_OUI, 3)) {
return HT_IOT_PEER_AIRGO;
} else {
Thanks,
-- Shreyansh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists