[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4e24f674-6250-626d-48cd-4e0fe60defa4@maciej.szmigiero.name>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 09:03:43 +0200
From: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@...il.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] KVM: Integrate gfn_to_memslot_approx() into
search_memslots()
On 19.05.2021 23:24, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Sun, May 16, 2021, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
>> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
>> index 8895b95b6a22..3c40c7d32f7e 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
>> @@ -1091,10 +1091,14 @@ bool kvm_arch_irqfd_allowed(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_irqfd *args);
>> * gfn_to_memslot() itself isn't here as an inline because that would
>> * bloat other code too much.
>> *
>> + * With "approx" set returns the memslot also when the address falls
>> + * in a hole. In that case one of the memslots bordering the hole is
>> + * returned.
>> + *
>> * IMPORTANT: Slots are sorted from highest GFN to lowest GFN!
>> */
>> static inline struct kvm_memory_slot *
>> -search_memslots(struct kvm_memslots *slots, gfn_t gfn)
>> +search_memslots(struct kvm_memslots *slots, gfn_t gfn, bool approx)
>
> An alternative to modifying the PPC code would be to make the existing
> search_memslots() a wrapper to __search_memslots(), with the latter taking
> @approx.
I guess you mean that if search_memslots() only does an exact search
(like the current code does) its 3 callers won't have to be modified.
Will do it then.
> We might also want to make this __always_inline to improve the likelihood of the
> compiler optimizing away @approx. I doubt it matters in practice...
Sounds like a good idea, will do.
Thanks,
Maciej
Powered by blists - more mailing lists