linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] PKCS#7: Check codeSigning EKU for kernel module and kexec pe verification

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210521094736.GP32436@linux-l9pv.suse>
Date:   Fri, 21 May 2021 17:47:36 +0800
From:   joeyli <jlee@...e.com>
To:     Varad Gautam <varad.gautam@...e.com>
Cc:     "Lee, Chun-Yi" <joeyli.kernel@...il.com>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Ben Boeckel <me@...boeckel.net>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Malte Gell <malte.gell@....de>, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] PKCS#7: Check codeSigning EKU for kernel module and
 kexec pe verification

Hi Varad,

On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 02:22:28PM +0800, Joey Lee wrote:
> Hi Varad,
> 
> Thanks for your review!
> 
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 02:08:32PM +0200, Varad Gautam wrote:
> > Hi Joey,
> > 
> > On 4/9/21 4:46 AM, Lee, Chun-Yi wrote:
> > > This patch adds the logic for checking the CodeSigning extended
> > > key usage when verifying signature of kernel module or
> > > kexec PE binary in PKCS#7.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: "Lee, Chun-Yi" <jlee@...e.com>
> > > ---
> > >  certs/system_keyring.c               |  2 +-
> > >  crypto/asymmetric_keys/Kconfig       |  9 +++++++++
> > >  crypto/asymmetric_keys/pkcs7_trust.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > >  include/crypto/pkcs7.h               |  3 ++-
> > >  4 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
[...snip]
> > >  
> > >  matched:
> > > +	if (!check_codesign_eku(key, usage)) {
> > 
> > Perhaps this can be a generic check_eku_usage() call, with codesigning as one of the
> > things it can check for.
> >
> 
> Because only codesign EKU be checked now. So I prefer to keep it
> as my current implementation until there have other EKU requirement. 

I have reworked this patch for a bug be found by kernel test robot. I think
that your suggestion is good. So I change the function name to a more generic
name check_eku_by_usage() in my v7 patch set.

Thanks a lot!
Joey Lee