linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Fix inconsistent indenting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 21 May 2021 11:49:42 +0200
From:   Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To:     Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@...ux.alibaba.com>, hmh@....eng.br
Cc:     mgross@...ux.intel.com, jdelvare@...e.com, linux@...ck-us.net,
        ibm-acpi-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Fix inconsistent indenting

Hi,

On 5/21/21 11:38 AM, Jiapeng Chong wrote:
> Eliminate the follow smatch warning:
> 
> drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c:7942 volume_write() warn:
> inconsistent indenting.
> 
> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> index dd60c93..d0aa566 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> @@ -7939,7 +7939,7 @@ static int volume_write(char *buf)
>  			} else if (sscanf(cmd, "level %u", &l) == 1 &&
>  				   l >= 0 && l <= TP_EC_VOLUME_MAX) {
>  					new_level = l;
> -				continue;
> +					continue;
>  			}
>  		}
>  		if (strlencmp(cmd, "mute") == 0)

Thank you for your patch, but actually the indentation of the "new_level = l;"
is wrong, it is indented one level too much.

Please send a new version changing (reducing) the indentation of the
"new_level = l;" statement instead.

Regards,

Hans