linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/186] 4.4.269-rc2 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+G9fYsOPio7aH_kGfdvuneuxt5oQVRSJmsXY2QEKz7jo1RH2w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 21 May 2021 15:32:25 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        linux-stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/186] 4.4.269-rc2 review

On Thu, 20 May 2021 at 20:53, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.269 release.
> There are 186 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 22 May 2021 15:21:59 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.269-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>

## Build
* kernel: 4.4.269-rc2
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git branch: linux-4.4.y
* git commit: 9d2abc11d0b5fe18f62908e3a918af52ac95b3a0
* git describe: v4.4.268-187-g9d2abc11d0b5
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.4.y/build/v4.4.268-187-g9d2abc11d0b5

## No regressions (compared to v4.4.268-191-g580f473963dc)

## Fixes (compared to v4.4.268-191-g580f473963dc)
* mips, build
  - gcc-10-allnoconfig
  - gcc-10-ar7_defconfig
  - gcc-10-ath79_defconfig
  - gcc-10-bcm47xx_defconfig
  - gcc-10-bcm63xx_defconfig
  - gcc-10-cavium_octeon_defconfig
  - gcc-10-defconfig
  - gcc-10-e55_defconfig
  - gcc-10-malta_defconfig
  - gcc-10-nlm_xlp_defconfig
  - gcc-10-rt305x_defconfig
  - gcc-10-tinyconfig
  - gcc-8-allnoconfig
  - gcc-8-ar7_defconfig
  - gcc-8-ath79_defconfig
  - gcc-8-bcm47xx_defconfig
  - gcc-8-bcm63xx_defconfig
  - gcc-8-cavium_octeon_defconfig
  - gcc-8-defconfig
  - gcc-8-e55_defconfig
  - gcc-8-malta_defconfig
  - gcc-8-nlm_xlp_defconfig
  - gcc-8-rt305x_defconfig
  - gcc-8-tinyconfig
  - gcc-9-allnoconfig
  - gcc-9-ar7_defconfig
  - gcc-9-ath79_defconfig
  - gcc-9-bcm47xx_defconfig
  - gcc-9-bcm63xx_defconfig
  - gcc-9-cavium_octeon_defconfig
  - gcc-9-defconfig
  - gcc-9-e55_defconfig
  - gcc-9-malta_defconfig
  - gcc-9-nlm_xlp_defconfig
  - gcc-9-rt305x_defconfig
  - gcc-9-tinyconfig

## Test result summary
 total: 36496, pass: 29277, fail: 624, skip: 6061, xfail: 534,

## Build Summary
* arm: 96 total, 96 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 23 total, 23 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 13 total, 13 passed, 0 failed
* juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed
* x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 13 total, 13 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary
* fwts
* install-android-platform-tools-r2600
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-bpf
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-lkdtm
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kvm-unit-tests
* libhugetlbfs
* linux-log-parser
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org