linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/2] Fix some VDM AMS handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210521130121.1470334-1-kyletso@google.com>
Date:   Fri, 21 May 2021 21:01:19 +0800
From:   Kyle Tso <kyletso@...gle.com>
To:     linux@...ck-us.net, heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc:     badhri@...gle.com, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kyle Tso <kyletso@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] Fix some VDM AMS handling

usb: typec: tcpm: Properly interrupt VDM AMS
- If VDM AMS is interrupted by Messages other than VDM, the current VDM
  AMS should be finished before handling the just arrived request. I add
  intercept code in the beginning of the handler of the three types of
  requests (control/data/extended) to ensure that the AMS is finished
  first.

usb: typec: tcpm: Respond Not_Supported if no snk_vdo
- The snk_vdo is for the responses to incoming VDM Discover Identity. If
  there is no data in snk_vdo, it means that the port doesn't even
  support it. According to PD3 Spec "Table 6-64 Response to an incoming
  VDM", the port should send Not_Supported Message as the response. For
  PD2 cases, it is defined in PD2 Spec "Table 6-41 Applicability of
  Structured VDM Commands - Note 3" that the port should "Ignore" the
  command.

Kyle Tso (2):
  usb: typec: tcpm: Properly interrupt VDM AMS
  usb: typec: tcpm: Respond Not_Supported if no snk_vdo

 drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

-- 
2.31.1.818.g46aad6cb9e-goog