[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210521152431.wspnsji3z7pmmdlf@bogus>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 16:24:31 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Hector Yuan <hector.yuan@...iatek.com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] dt-bindings: dvfs: Add support for generic
performance domains
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 09:38:34AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 20-05-21, 14:43, Rob Herring wrote:
> > Not allowed because I can't turn this check on by default until we get
> > rid of the existing 80 or so. But it is a new check and Viresh already
> > applied, so oh well.
>
> I can always drop it :)
>
While I really don't care(evident by rate at which I worked on this 😉)
I think Hector Yuan won't be happy to wait I guess. As a quick fix, you
can update "qcom,cpufreq-hw" to "mediatek,cpufreq-hw". You will still
get warning with this patch + update alone, but once you have Hector's
mediatek cpufreq driver applied, the warnings must disappear.
What do you think ?
--
Regards,
Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists