[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPNVh5fhkgscs44Lpj3DPBrA9NrhFohUpRwpT2iMM1BDBcLW4A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 09:03:07 -0700
From: Peter Oskolkov <posk@...gle.com>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-api <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Peter Oskolkov <posk@...k.io>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrei Vagin <avagin@...gle.com>,
Jim Newsome <jnewsome@...project.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v0.1 0/9] UMCG early preview/RFC patchset
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 8:08 AM Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> wrote:
[...]
> Documentation patches can help to guide that discussion; they also need
> to be reviewed as well. So yes, I think they should be present from the
> beginning. But then, that's the position I'm supposed to take :) This
> is a big change to the kernel's system-call API, I don't think that
> there can be a proper discussion of that without a description of what
> you're trying to do.
Hi Jon,
There are doc comments in patches 2 and 7 in umcg.c documenting the
new syscalls. That said, I'll prepare a separate doc patch - I guess
I'll add Documentation/scheduler/umcg.rst, unless you tell me there is
a better place to do that. ETA mid-to-late next week.
Thanks,
Peter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists