[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YKjbxhzD/yKQ6B2R@dU2104>
Date: Sat, 22 May 2021 15:54:06 +0530
From: Deepak R Varma <drv@...lo.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] staging: media: atomisp: code formatting changes
sh_css_params.c
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 01:52:22PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Sat, May 01, 2021 at 12:16:07PM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> > @@ -1562,8 +1544,10 @@ ia_css_isp_3a_statistics_map_allocate(
> > base_ptr = me->data_ptr;
> >
> > me->size = isp_stats->size;
> > - /* GCC complains when we assign a char * to a void *, so these
> > - * casts are necessary unfortunately. */
> > + /*
> > + * GCC complains when we assign a char * to a void *, so these
> > + * casts are necessary unfortunately.
> > + */
>
> Not related to your patch, but assigning a char pointer to a void
> pointer is fine and GCC will not complain. The problem is that
> me->dmem_stats is not a void pointer. Someone should delete that
> nonsense comment.
I agree. Well caught. I will remove these comments and send v2. Waiting for feedback
on other patches of this series.
deepak.
>
> > me->dmem_stats = (void *)base_ptr;
> > me->vmem_stats_hi = (void *)(base_ptr + isp_stats->dmem_size);
> > me->vmem_stats_lo = (void *)(base_ptr + isp_stats->dmem_size +
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists