[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210522232256.00003f08@garyguo.net>
Date: Sat, 22 May 2021 23:22:56 +0100
From: Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>
Cc: Nick Hu <nickhu@...estech.com>, Nylon Chen <nylon7@...estech.com>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: fix memmove and optimise memcpy when misalign
On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 22:55:51 +0000
Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net> wrote:
> 04091d6 introduces an assembly version of memmove but
> it does take misalignment into account (it checks if
> length is a multiple of machine word size but pointers
> need also be aligned). As a result it will generate
> misaligned load/store for the majority of cases and causes
> significant performance regression on hardware that traps
> misaligned load/store and emulate them using firmware.
>
> The current behaviour of memcpy is that it checks if both
> src and dest pointers are co-aligned (aka congruent
> modular SZ_REG). If aligned, it will copy data word-by-word
> after first aligning pointers to word boundary. If src
> and dst are not co-aligned, however, byte-wise copy will
> be performed.
>
> This patch fixes the memmove and optimises memcpy for
> misaligned cases. It will first align destination pointer
> to word-boundary regardless whether src and dest are
> co-aligned or not. If they indeed are, then wordwise copy
> is performed. If they are not co-aligned, then it will
> load two adjacent words from src and use shifts to assemble
> a full machine word. Some additional assembly level
> micro-optimisation is also performed to ensure more
> instructions can be compressed (e.g. prefer a0 to t6).
>
> In my testing this speeds up memcpy 4~5x when src and dest
> are not co-aligned (which is quite common in networking),
> and speeds up memmove 1000+x by avoiding trapping to firmware.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>
> ---
> arch/riscv/lib/memcpy.S | 223
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- arch/riscv/lib/memmove.S |
> 176 ++++++++++++++++++++---------- 2 files changed, 257
> insertions(+), 142 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/lib/memcpy.S b/arch/riscv/lib/memcpy.S
> index 51ab716253fa..00672c19ad9b 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/lib/memcpy.S
> +++ b/arch/riscv/lib/memcpy.S
> @@ -9,100 +9,151 @@
> /* void *memcpy(void *, const void *, size_t) */
> ENTRY(__memcpy)
> WEAK(memcpy)
> - move t6, a0 /* Preserve return value */
> + /* Save for return value */
> + mv t6, a0
>
> - /* Defer to byte-oriented copy for small sizes */
> - sltiu a3, a2, 128
> - bnez a3, 4f
> - /* Use word-oriented copy only if low-order bits match */
> - andi a3, t6, SZREG-1
> - andi a4, a1, SZREG-1
> - bne a3, a4, 4f
> + /*
> + * Register allocation for code below:
> + * a0 - start of uncopied dst
> + * a1 - start of uncopied src
> + * t0 - end of uncopied dst
> + */
> + add t0, a0, a2
>
> - beqz a3, 2f /* Skip if already aligned */
> /*
> - * Round to nearest double word-aligned address
> - * greater than or equal to start address
> + * Use bytewise copy if too small.
> + *
> + * This threshold must be at least 2*SZREG to ensure at
> least one
> + * wordwise copy is performed. It is chosen to be 16 because
> it will
> + * save at least 7 iterations of bytewise copy, which pays
> off the
> + * fixed overhead.
> */
> - andi a3, a1, ~(SZREG-1)
> - addi a3, a3, SZREG
> - /* Handle initial misalignment */
> - sub a4, a3, a1
> + li a3, 16
> + bltu a2, a3, .Lbyte_copy_tail
> +
> + /*
> + * Bytewise copy first to align a0 to word boundary.
> + */
> + addi a2, a0, SZREG-1
> + andi a2, a2, ~(SZREG-1)
> + beq a0, a2, 2f
> 1:
> - lb a5, 0(a1)
> - addi a1, a1, 1
> - sb a5, 0(t6)
> - addi t6, t6, 1
> - bltu a1, a3, 1b
> - sub a2, a2, a4 /* Update count */
> + lb a5, 0(a1)
> + addi a1, a1, 1
> + sb a5, 0(a0)
> + addi a0, a0, 1
> + bne a0, a2, 1b
> +2:
> +
> + /*
> + * Now a0 is word-aligned. If a1 is also word aligned, we
> could perform
> + * aligned word-wise copy. Otherwise we need to perform
> misaligned
> + * word-wise copy.
> + */
> + andi a3, a1, SZREG-1
> + bnez a3, .Lmisaligned_word_copy
>
> + /* Unrolled wordwise copy */
> + addi t0, t0, -(16*SZREG-1)
> + bgeu a0, t0, 2f
> +1:
> + REG_L a2, 0(a1)
> + REG_L a3, SZREG(a1)
> + REG_L a4, 2*SZREG(a1)
> + REG_L a5, 3*SZREG(a1)
> + REG_L a6, 4*SZREG(a1)
> + REG_L a7, 5*SZREG(a1)
> + REG_L t1, 6*SZREG(a1)
> + REG_L t2, 7*SZREG(a1)
> + REG_L t3, 8*SZREG(a1)
> + REG_L t4, 9*SZREG(a1)
> + REG_L t5, 10*SZREG(a1)
> + REG_S a2, 0(a0)
> + REG_S a3, SZREG(a0)
> + REG_S a4, 2*SZREG(a0)
> + REG_S a5, 3*SZREG(a0)
> + REG_S a6, 4*SZREG(a0)
> + REG_S a7, 5*SZREG(a0)
> + REG_S t1, 6*SZREG(a0)
> + REG_S t2, 7*SZREG(a0)
> + REG_S t3, 8*SZREG(a0)
> + REG_S t4, 9*SZREG(a0)
> + REG_S t5, 10*SZREG(a0)
> + REG_L a2, 11*SZREG(a1)
> + REG_L a3, 12*SZREG(a1)
> + REG_L a4, 13*SZREG(a1)
> + REG_L a5, 14*SZREG(a1)
> + REG_L a6, 15*SZREG(a1)
> + addi a1, a1, 16*SZREG
> + REG_S a2, 11*SZREG(a0)
> + REG_S a3, 12*SZREG(a0)
> + REG_S a4, 13*SZREG(a0)
> + REG_S a5, 14*SZREG(a0)
> + REG_S a6, 15*SZREG(a0)
> + addi a0, a0, 16*SZREG
> + bltu a0, t0, 1b
> 2:
> - andi a4, a2, ~((16*SZREG)-1)
> - beqz a4, 4f
> - add a3, a1, a4
> -3:
> - REG_L a4, 0(a1)
> - REG_L a5, SZREG(a1)
> - REG_L a6, 2*SZREG(a1)
> - REG_L a7, 3*SZREG(a1)
> - REG_L t0, 4*SZREG(a1)
> - REG_L t1, 5*SZREG(a1)
> - REG_L t2, 6*SZREG(a1)
> - REG_L t3, 7*SZREG(a1)
> - REG_L t4, 8*SZREG(a1)
> - REG_L t5, 9*SZREG(a1)
> - REG_S a4, 0(t6)
> - REG_S a5, SZREG(t6)
> - REG_S a6, 2*SZREG(t6)
> - REG_S a7, 3*SZREG(t6)
> - REG_S t0, 4*SZREG(t6)
> - REG_S t1, 5*SZREG(t6)
> - REG_S t2, 6*SZREG(t6)
> - REG_S t3, 7*SZREG(t6)
> - REG_S t4, 8*SZREG(t6)
> - REG_S t5, 9*SZREG(t6)
> - REG_L a4, 10*SZREG(a1)
> - REG_L a5, 11*SZREG(a1)
> - REG_L a6, 12*SZREG(a1)
> - REG_L a7, 13*SZREG(a1)
> - REG_L t0, 14*SZREG(a1)
> - REG_L t1, 15*SZREG(a1)
> - addi a1, a1, 16*SZREG
> - REG_S a4, 10*SZREG(t6)
> - REG_S a5, 11*SZREG(t6)
> - REG_S a6, 12*SZREG(t6)
> - REG_S a7, 13*SZREG(t6)
> - REG_S t0, 14*SZREG(t6)
> - REG_S t1, 15*SZREG(t6)
> - addi t6, t6, 16*SZREG
> - bltu a1, a3, 3b
> - andi a2, a2, (16*SZREG)-1 /* Update count */
> -
> -4:
> - /* Handle trailing misalignment */
> - beqz a2, 6f
> - add a3, a1, a2
> -
> - /* Use word-oriented copy if co-aligned to word boundary */
> - or a5, a1, t6
> - or a5, a5, a3
> - andi a5, a5, 3
> - bnez a5, 5f
> -7:
> - lw a4, 0(a1)
> - addi a1, a1, 4
> - sw a4, 0(t6)
> - addi t6, t6, 4
> - bltu a1, a3, 7b
> + /* Post-loop increment by 16*SZREG-1 and pre-loop decrement
> by SZREG-1 */
> + addi t0, t0, 15*SZREG
>
> - ret
> + /* Wordwise copy */
> + bgeu a0, t0, 2f
> +1:
> + REG_L a5, 0(a1)
> + addi a1, a1, SZREG
> + REG_S a5, 0(a0)
> + addi a0, a0, SZREG
> + bltu a0, t0, 1b
> +2:
> + addi t0, t0, SZREG-1
>
> -5:
> - lb a4, 0(a1)
> - addi a1, a1, 1
> - sb a4, 0(t6)
> - addi t6, t6, 1
> - bltu a1, a3, 5b
> -6:
> +.Lbyte_copy_tail:
> + /*
> + * Bytewise copy anything left.
> + */
> + beq a0, t0, 2f
> +1:
> + lb a5, 0(a1)
> + addi a1, a1, 1
> + sb a5, 0(a0)
> + addi a0, a0, 1
> + bne a0, t0, 1b
> +2:
> +
> + mv a0, t6
> ret
> +
> +.Lmisaligned_word_copy:
> + /*
> + * Misaligned word-wise copy.
> + * For misaligned copy we still perform word-wise copy, but
> we need to
> + * use the value fetched from the previous iteration and do
> some shifts.
> + * This is safe because we wouldn't access more words than
> necessary.
> + */
> +
> + /* Calculate shifts */
> + slli t3, a3, 3
> + sub t4, x0, t3 /* negate is okay as shift will only
> look at LSBs */ +
> + /* Load the initial value and align a1 */
> + andi a1, a1, ~(SZREG-1)
> + REG_L a5, 0(a1)
> +
> + addi t0, t0, -(SZREG-1)
> + /* At least one iteration will be executed here, no check */
> +1:
> + srl a4, a5, t3
> + REG_L a5, SZREG(a1)
> + addi a1, a1, SZREG
> + sll a2, a5, t4
> + or a2, a2, a4
> + REG_S a2, 0(a0)
> + addi a0, a0, SZREG
> + bltu a0, t0, 1b
> +
> + /* Update pointers to correct value */
> + addi t0, t0, SZREG-1
> + add a1, a1, a3
> +
> + j .Lbyte_copy_tail
> END(__memcpy)
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/lib/memmove.S b/arch/riscv/lib/memmove.S
> index 07d1d2152ba5..fbe6701dbe4a 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/lib/memmove.S
> +++ b/arch/riscv/lib/memmove.S
> @@ -5,60 +5,124 @@
>
> ENTRY(__memmove)
> WEAK(memmove)
> - move t0, a0
> - move t1, a1
> -
> - beq a0, a1, exit_memcpy
> - beqz a2, exit_memcpy
> - srli t2, a2, 0x2
> -
> - slt t3, a0, a1
> - beqz t3, do_reverse
> -
> - andi a2, a2, 0x3
> - li t4, 1
> - beqz t2, byte_copy
> -
> -word_copy:
> - lw t3, 0(a1)
> - addi t2, t2, -1
> - addi a1, a1, 4
> - sw t3, 0(a0)
> - addi a0, a0, 4
> - bnez t2, word_copy
> - beqz a2, exit_memcpy
> - j byte_copy
> -
> -do_reverse:
> - add a0, a0, a2
> - add a1, a1, a2
> - andi a2, a2, 0x3
> - li t4, -1
> - beqz t2, reverse_byte_copy
> -
> -reverse_word_copy:
> - addi a1, a1, -4
> - addi t2, t2, -1
> - lw t3, 0(a1)
> - addi a0, a0, -4
> - sw t3, 0(a0)
> - bnez t2, reverse_word_copy
> - beqz a2, exit_memcpy
> -
> -reverse_byte_copy:
> - addi a0, a0, -1
> - addi a1, a1, -1
> -
> -byte_copy:
> - lb t3, 0(a1)
> - addi a2, a2, -1
> - sb t3, 0(a0)
> - add a1, a1, t4
> - add a0, a0, t4
> - bnez a2, byte_copy
> -
> -exit_memcpy:
> - move a0, t0
> - move a1, t1
> - ret
> + /*
> + * Here we determine if forward copy is possible. Forward
> copy is
> + * preferred to backward copy as it is more cache friendly.
> + *
> + * If a0 >= a1, t0 gives their distance, if t0 >= a2 then we
> can
> + * copy forward.
> + * If a0 < a1, we can always copy forward. This will make t0
> negative,
> + * so a *unsigned* comparison will always have t0 >= a2.
> + *
> + * For forward copy we just delegate the task to memcpy.
> + */
> + sub t0, a0, a1
> + bltu t0, a2, 1f
> + tail __memcpy
> +1:
> +
> + /*
> + * Register allocation for code below:
> + * a0 - end of uncopied dst
> + * a1 - end of uncopied src
> + * t0 - start of uncopied dst
> + */
> + mv t0, a0
> + add a0, a0, a2
> + add a1, a1, a2
> +
> + /*
> + * Use bytewise copy if too small.
> + *
> + * This threshold must be at least 2*SZREG to ensure at
> least one
> + * wordwise copy is performed. It is chosen to be 16 because
> it will
> + * save at least 7 iterations of bytewise copy, which pays
> off the
> + * fixed overhead.
> + */
> + li a3, 16
> + bltu a2, a3, .Lbyte_copy_tail
> +
> + /*
> + * Bytewise copy first to align t0 to word boundary.
> + */
> + andi a2, a0, ~(SZREG-1)
> + beq a0, a2, 2f
> +1:
> + addi a1, a1, -1
> + lb a5, 0(a1)
> + addi a0, a0, -1
> + sb a5, 0(a0)
> + bne a0, a2, 1b
> +2:
> +
> + /*
> + * Now a0 is word-aligned. If a1 is also word aligned, we
> could perform
> + * aligned word-wise copy. Otherwise we need to perform
> misaligned
> + * word-wise copy.
> + */
> + andi a3, a1, SZREG-1
> + bnez a3, .Lmisaligned_word_copy
> +
> + /* Wordwise copy */
> + addi t0, t0, SZREG-1
> + bleu a0, t0, 2f
> +1:
> + addi a1, a1, -SZREG
> + REG_L a5, 0(a1)
> + addi a0, a0, -SZREG
> + REG_S a5, 0(a0)
> + bgtu a0, t0, 1b
> +2:
> + addi t0, t0, -(SZREG-1)
> +
> +.Lbyte_copy_tail:
> + /*
> + * Bytewise copy anything left.
> + */
> + beq a0, t0, 2f
> +1:
> + addi a1, a1, -1
> + lb a5, 0(a1)
> + addi a0, a0, -1
> + sb a5, 0(a0)
> + bne a0, t0, 1b
> +2:
> +
> + mv a0, t0
> + ret
> +
> +.Lmisaligned_word_copy:
> + /*
> + * Misaligned word-wise copy.
> + * For misaligned copy we still perform word-wise copy, but
> we need to
> + * use the value fetched from the previous iteration and do
> some shifts.
> + * This is safe because we wouldn't access more words than
> necessary.
> + */
> +
> + /* Calculate shifts */
> + slli t3, a3, 3
> + sub t4, x0, t3 /* negate is okay as shift will only
> look at LSBs */ +
> + /* Load the initial value and align a1 */
> + andi a1, a1, ~(SZREG-1)
> + REG_L a5, 0(a1)
> +
> + addi t0, t0, SZREG-1
> + /* At least one iteration will be executed here, no check */
> +1:
> + sll a4, a5, t4
> + addi a1, a1, -SZREG
> + REG_L a5, 0(a1)
> + srl a2, a5, t3
> + or a2, a2, a4
> + addi a0, a0, -SZREG
> + REG_S a2, 0(a0)
> + bgtu a0, t0, 1b
> +
> + /* Update pointers to correct value */
> + addi t0, t0, -(SZREG-1)
> + add a1, a1, a3
> +
> + j .Lbyte_copy_tail
> +
> END(__memmove)
ping. It's been 3 month since submission and I really would like to see
this applied or at least have some feedbacks.
Link to the original patch in archive:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20210216225555.4976-1-gary@garyguo.net/
- Gary
Powered by blists - more mailing lists