[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YKp7km95KCUhykig@krava>
Date: Sun, 23 May 2021 17:58:10 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Denys Zagorui <dzagorui@...co.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, namhyung@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/3] perf tests: avoid storing an absolute path in
perf binary
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 10:27:52AM -0700, Denys Zagorui wrote:
SNIP
> free(cmd);
> +out:
> + free(pythonpath);
> return ret;
> }
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/util.c b/tools/perf/util/util.c
> index 3bba74e431ed..53f3dbf02f58 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/util.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/util.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> #include "cap.h"
> #include "strlist.h"
> #include "string2.h"
> +#include <libgen.h>
>
> /*
> * XXX We need to find a better place for these things...
> @@ -388,3 +389,14 @@ char *perf_exe(char *buf, int len)
> }
> return strcpy(buf, "perf");
> }
> +
> +char *perf_exe_path(void)
> +{
> + char buf[PATH_MAX];
> + char *dname;
> +
> + perf_exe(buf, PATH_MAX);
> + dname = dirname(buf);
I think this is equally bad.. once you get out of perf_exe_path,
dname might be screwed
> +
> + return dname;
just return strdup(dname) in here?
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists