linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 00/28] leds: cleanups and fwnode refcounting bug fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210524174903.GA29340@duo.ucw.cz>
Date:   Mon, 24 May 2021 19:49:03 +0200
From:   Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Amireddy Mallikarjuna reddy <mallikarjunax.reddy@...ux.intel.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Marek Behún <marek.behun@....cz>,
        Abanoub Sameh <abanoubsameh8@...il.com>,
        Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/28] leds: cleanups and fwnode refcounting bug fixes

On Mon 2021-05-24 17:56:13, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 10:30:08AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 12:50:17PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > When analyzing the current state of affairs with fwnode reference counting
> > > I found that a lot of core doesn't take it right. Here is a bunch of
> > > corresponding fixes against LED drivers.
> > > 
> > > The series includes some cleanups and a few other fixes grouped by a driver.
> > > 
> > > First two patches are taking care of -ENOTSUPP error code too  prevent its
> > > appearance in the user space.
> > 
> > Pavel, any comments on this bug fix series?
> 
> Pavel, we are at rc-3 already and this is kinda a big series that needs more
> time to be sit in Linux-next, unfortunately while I see your activities here
> and there, it is kept uncommented and unapplied. Can you shed a light what's
> going on here? Do I need something to be amended?

I'm busy, sorry.

Series looks kind of okay on quick look.

									Pavel
-- 
http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (196 bytes)